Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Motivasi Kerja Pada Staf Administrasi PT Nipsea Paint And Chemicals Amelia Ramadanti; Sungkono
PENG: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Manajemen Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Juli: Accounting economics and other economic issues
Publisher : Teewan Journal Solutions

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62710/am0az246

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji pengaruh gaya kepemimpinan dan motivasi kerja terhadap kinerja staf administrasi di PT Nipsea Paint and Chemicals. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kuantitatif dengan pendekatan survei, di mana data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner yang disebarkan kepada staf administrasi perusahaan. Analisis data dilakukan menggunakan teknik statistik deskriptif dan inferensial, termasuk analisis regresi linier sederhana dan berganda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara parsial, variabel gaya kepemimpinan berpengaruh positif signifikan terhadap kinerja administrasi dengan nilai sig 0,000 < α (0,05) dan thitung (12,048) > ttabel (0,679). Selain itu, variabel motivasi juga berpengaruh positif signifikan terhadap kinerja administrasi dengan nilai sig 0,004 < α (0,05) dan thitung (1,764) > ttabel (0,679). Secara simultan, variabel gaya kepemimpinan dan motivasi berpengaruh sangat signifikan terhadap kinerja administrasi dengan nilai sig 0,000 < α (0,05) dan Fhitung (433,764) > Ftabel (3,18). Temuan ini mengindikasikan bahwa penerapan gaya kepemimpinan yang efektif dan peningkatan motivasi kerja dapat secara signifikan meningkatkan kinerja staf administrasi di PT Nipsea Paint and Chemicals. Implikasi dari penelitian ini adalah pentingnya manajemen untuk mengembangkan dan menerapkan strategi kepemimpinan dan motivasi yang tepat guna mencapai kinerja organisasi yang lebih baik.
Pengaruh Komunikasi dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan pada PT Nipsea Paint And Chemicals Amelia Ramadanti; Sari Marliani; July Yuliawati
Al-Kharaj: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah Vol. 7 No. 8 (2025): Al-Kharaj: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah
Publisher : Intitut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/alkharaj.v7i8.7882

Abstract

In the global business world, companies are required to always improve their competitiveness, innovation, and “In the global business world, companies are required to always improve their competitiveness, innovation, and productivity. In this era of globalization, companies must be able to adapt to changes that occur rapidly in the global market. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of communication and work environment on employee performance at PT Nipsea Paint and Chemicals. The study was conducted using quantitative research with descriptive and verification approaches. The population and sample of the study involved 80 respondents from PT Nipsea Paint and Chemicals, with a saturated sample method for sampling. Using a multiple linear regression analysis model to analyze data at a significance level of 5%. The results showed that the communication score of PT Nipsea Paint and Chemicals was 299.6 in the range of 261-342 with fairly good criteria. In the Work Environment it was 311.1 in the range of 261-342 with fairly good criteria. And the total Employee Performance score was 327.4 in the range of 261-342 with fairly good criteria. Partially, the Communication variable got a sig value. 0.043 < 0.05 and t count = 2.063 > t table = 1.990. The work environment variable partially gets a sig. value of 0.000 < 0.05, and t count = 4.438 > t table = 1.990. Communication and work environment have a simultaneous effect on employee performance, a sig. value of 0.000 < 0.05 and f count = 22.297 > f table = 3.12. The results of the determination coefficient test obtained an adjusted R-square value of 0.367 (36.7%). Showing that employee performance variables can be explained by communication and work environment variables by 36.7%, then the remaining value is 63.3% (100% - 36.7%) which explains other variables not examined in this study such as motivation, work discipline, compensation, work culture, commitment, and others "