Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Humanities and Social Studies
Baquandi Lutvi Yoseanto
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE MEASURING TOOLS Baquandi Lutvi Yoseanto
JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL STUDIES Vol. 2 No. 03 (2024): AUGUST 2024
Publisher : Media Inovasi Pendidikan dan Publikasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Organizational justice is an employee's personal evaluation of the ethical and moral standing of what the company/organization does. Organizational justice is one of the quite important problems faced by companies because it contributes to employee performance. This study aims to test the validity of the construct of the organizational justice measurement tool. The approach in this study is a quantitative approach with a sample of 209 participants. Data collection with simple random sampling using a g-form questionnaire. The measuring instrument in this study was the Organizational Justice Scale questionnaire by Colquitt. The analysis method used the CFA test using a structural equation model. The results of this study indicate that the CFA model is fit with details: Chi Square = 375.116 (p = 0.000), RMSEA = 0.088, GFI = 0.831, CFI = 0.935, and TLI = 0.922. The model modification carried out was by eliminating 1 manifest variable and covariance between 5 pairs of error variables. The results of this study can be used for the wider community, especially organizations that want to see how employees assess fairness so that corrective actions can be taken. Companies can also prevent the impacts that will arise.
CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF NEGATIVE AFFECTS MEASURING TOOLS Baquandi Lutvi Yoseanto
JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL STUDIES Vol. 3 No. 01 (2025): FEBRUARY 2025
Publisher : Media Inovasi Pendidikan dan Publikasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Negative affect is a general state of subjective stress and unpleasant conditions including anger, contempt, disgust, guilt, fear, and nervousness. This study aims to test the construct validity of the negative affect measurement tool. The approach in this study is a quantitative approach with a sample of 209 participants. Data collection was carried out by simple random sampling using a g-form questionnaire. The measuring instrument in this study was the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) questionnaire by Watson, Clark and Tellegen (1988) which was adapted by the Research and Measurement section of the Faculty of Psychology, Tarumanagara University. The analysis method used the CFA test using a structural equation model. The results of this study indicate that the CFA model is fit with the following details: Chi Square = 431.229 (p = 0.000), RMSEA = 0.076, GFI = 0.842, CFI = 0.916, and TLI = 0.901. The model modifications carried out were by eliminating 5 manifest variables and covariancing 13 pairs of error variables. The results of this study can be used for the wider community, especially companies or organizations that want to see the level of negative affect of employees so that preventive and corrective actions can be taken.
CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF COUNTERPRODUCTIVE WORK BEHAVIOR-ORGANIZATIONAL MEASURING TOOLS Baquandi Lutvi Yoseanto
JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL STUDIES Vol. 2 No. 01 (2024): FEBRUARY 2024
Publisher : Media Inovasi Pendidikan dan Publikasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Counterproductive work behavior-organizational (CWB-O) is a variety of intentional behavior that harms/endangers the organization. Counterproductive organizational work behavior is one of the serious problems faced by companies because it is related to material/financial losses. This research aims to test the construct validity of counterproductive organizational work behavior questionnaire. The approach in this research is quantitative with a sample of 209 participants. Data collection was carried out by simple random sampling using a g-form questionnaires. The measuring tool in this research is the Workplace Deviance Scale by Bennett & Robinson. The analysis method uses the CFA test using structural equation modeling. The results of this study indicate that the CFA model is fit with details: Chi Square=69.193 (p=0.000), RMSEA=0.077, GFI=0.933, CFI=0.954, and TLI=0.933. The model modification was to remove 17 manifest variables and covariate between 4 pairs of error variables. The results of this research can be used by the wider community, especially companies or organizations that want to see the level of counterproductive work behavior of employees in the workplace so that preventive or corrective action can be taken.
Co-Authors