Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Comparative Analysis of Accounting Information’s Quality Pre and Post IFRS Adoption Mira Apriliana Sari; Liza Alvia; Agrianti Komalasari; Sari Indah Oktanti
International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): June : International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Ekonomi dan Akuntansi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61132/ijema.v1i2.47

Abstract

Adoption of IFRS in Indonesia began in 2008, namely the initial adoption stage of IFRS based on Indonesia's commitment to support its achievements in one global accounting standard at the G20. IAI itself formulated the full adoption of IFRS in several stages, namely (1) the initial stage of IFRS adoption which began in 2008, (2) the convergence stage of preparation for full adoption of IFRS in 2010, (3) the first stage of full adoption of IFRS which began in 2012, (4) the second stage of full adoption of IFRS in 2015, (5) the third stage of full adoption of IFRS in 2018, (6) and the fourth stage of full adoption of IFRS in 2020. IFRS adoption is sought as a form of improving good financial reporting in improving quality of accounting information. This research will examine differences in the quality of accounting information before and after full adoption of IFRS. This research will take a sample of telecommunications sub sector companies,healthcare, and consumer non-cyclical registered as a member of the BEI. This research examines the value relevance of Ohlson's stock price proxy. The analysis technique used is paired sample t-test with a significance level of 5%. This research concludes that the full adoption of IFRS stage one has contributed to improving the quality of accounting information. This research shows that the quality of accounting information as seen from its value relevance will increase followed by a high increase in disclosure.
Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance, Kinerja Keuangan, dan Earning Per Share terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Badan Usaha Milik Negara Anggun Fitrah Sari; Ade Widiyanti; Ratna Septiyanti; Sari Indah Oktanti
Jurnal Ekonomi, Akuntansi, dan Perpajakan Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Mei : Jurnal Ekonomi, Akuntansi, dan Perpajakan (JEAP)
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Ekonomi dan Akuntansi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61132/jeap.v3i2.2226

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of Good Corporate Governance (GCG), financial performance, and Earning Per Share (EPS) on firm value. The object of this research consists of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period of 2021–2024. This study employs a quantitative approach using secondary data in the form of annual financial statements as the primary source. The sample was selected using purposive sampling based on predetermined criteria, ensuring that only companies with complete data and consistent reporting were included in the analysis. The independent variables analyzed include the audit committee, independent commissioners, institutional ownership, Return on Assets (ROA), and Earning Per Share (EPS). Multiple linear regression analysis was used to process the data in this study, allowing the researchers to examine the simultaneous and partial effects of the variables on firm value. The findings indicate that firm value is significantly influenced by financial performance, particularly ROA, highlighting the importance of operational efficiency and profitability in enhancing shareholder wealth. While certain GCG variables such as institutional ownership showed positive influence, other elements like audit committees and independent commissioners produced mixed results, suggesting that governance mechanisms may have varying effects depending on organizational context. Meanwhile, EPS demonstrated inconsistent results in relation to firm value, implying that market perceptions of earnings may not fully capture the impact on overall firm valuation. This study provides insights for policymakers, investors, and corporate managers on the relative importance of governance and financial indicators in value creation for state-owned enterprises.