Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice IJBLPS International Journal of Business, Law and Political Science
Normurotovna, Esanova Zamira
Unknown Affiliation
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
CASES RELATED TO THE RIGHTS AND LEGAL CAPACITY OF CITIZENS (SUBSTANTIVE AND PROCEDURAL LEGAL ASPECTS) Normurotovna, Esanova Zamira
International Journal of Business, Law and Political Science Vol. 1 No. 6 (2024): International Journal of Business, Law and Political Science
Publisher : PT ANTIS INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61796/ijblps.v1i6.159

Abstract

The rights and legal capacity of citizens are fundamental components of the legal system, encompassing both substantive and procedural dimensions. The evolution of legal frameworks governing these rights reflects broader societal changes and varying judicial interpretations across jurisdictions. Despite extensive legal scholarship, there remains a critical gap in understanding how different legal systems address the interplay between substantive rights and procedural mechanisms, particularly in emerging and transitional contexts. This study aims to analyze and compare the substantive and procedural aspects of legal capacity and rights across diverse legal systems to identify commonalities, differences, and underlying principles. The analysis reveals significant variation in how legal systems define and enforce citizens' rights and capacities, influenced by historical, cultural, and legal factors. Specific procedural mechanisms, such as judicial review and administrative oversight, play pivotal roles in shaping substantive outcomes. This research provides a novel comparative perspective by integrating case studies from both developed and developing jurisdictions, offering new insights into the effectiveness and limitations of current legal frameworks. The findings have important implications for policymakers and legal practitioners, suggesting that reforms may be necessary to enhance consistency and fairness in the protection of citizens' rights and legal capacity, with potential benefits for both legal theory and practical application.
Subordination of Civil Cases: Theoretical Rules and Practical Problems Normurotovna, Esanova Zamira
Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): March
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/ijlj.v1i3.2094

Abstract

This article is devoted to the topic of subordination, which is one of the oldest and most relevant institutions of civil procedural law, the content of this topic includes which body is competent to consider disputes (cases), its criteria and conditions, as well as the limits of the competence of the court and other bodies in this area. The task of subordination in a broad sense determines the forms of protection (judicial or extrajudicial resolution) of the rights and interests of individuals (individuals and legal entities). In a narrow sense, it is understood to belong to a number of state bodies and organizations empowered to protect violated and disputed subjective rights of individuals and legal entities and their legally protected interests. The subordination of cases plays a key role in delineating their powers from each other. The article also includes aspects of subordination, which is a broad concept in relation to jurisdiction, similarities and differences with this procedural institution. At the same time, the article provides detailed information and analysis of several types of subordination in civil procedural law, including alternative, contractual, imperative and exceptional types. At the end of the article, problems related to the topic of subordination, suggestions and recommendations for their solution, and the author's conclusions are presented.
CASES RELATED TO THE RIGHTS AND LEGAL CAPACITY OF CITIZENS (SUBSTANTIVE AND PROCEDURAL LEGAL ASPECTS) Normurotovna, Esanova Zamira
International Journal of Business, Law and Political Science Vol. 1 No. 6 (2024): International Journal of Business, Law and Political Science
Publisher : PT. Antis International Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61796/ijblps.v1i6.159

Abstract

The rights and legal capacity of citizens are fundamental components of the legal system, encompassing both substantive and procedural dimensions. The evolution of legal frameworks governing these rights reflects broader societal changes and varying judicial interpretations across jurisdictions. Despite extensive legal scholarship, there remains a critical gap in understanding how different legal systems address the interplay between substantive rights and procedural mechanisms, particularly in emerging and transitional contexts. This study aims to analyze and compare the substantive and procedural aspects of legal capacity and rights across diverse legal systems to identify commonalities, differences, and underlying principles. The analysis reveals significant variation in how legal systems define and enforce citizens' rights and capacities, influenced by historical, cultural, and legal factors. Specific procedural mechanisms, such as judicial review and administrative oversight, play pivotal roles in shaping substantive outcomes. This research provides a novel comparative perspective by integrating case studies from both developed and developing jurisdictions, offering new insights into the effectiveness and limitations of current legal frameworks. The findings have important implications for policymakers and legal practitioners, suggesting that reforms may be necessary to enhance consistency and fairness in the protection of citizens' rights and legal capacity, with potential benefits for both legal theory and practical application.
Co-Authors