Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal IJBLPS International Journal of Business, Law and Political Science
Iskandarovich, Gazibekov Khurshid
Unknown Affiliation
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
HERBIVOROUS ANIMALS AN ULARNING ANALOG AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES CONTRADICT EACH Iskandarovich, Gazibekov Khurshid
International Journal of Business, Law and Political Science Vol. 1 No. 6 (2024): International Journal of Business, Law and Political Science
Publisher : PT ANTIS INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61796/ijblps.v1i6.162

Abstract

The interplay between legal regulations concerning herbivorous animals, their analogs, and psychotropic substances represents a complex and multifaceted issue within legal and ethical frameworks. The legal classification and control of psychotropic substances often clash with the regulation of herbivorous animals and their by-products, leading to significant legal ambiguities and challenges. Herbivorous animals and their by-products are generally subject to regulations that ensure animal welfare, food safety, and environmental protection. In contrast, psychotropic substances are regulated to prevent misuse and protect public health. The overlap and divergence between these regulatory domains highlight a legal conundrum, especially when considering the use of animal-derived products in contexts that intersect with psychotropic substances. Despite existing regulations, there is a notable lack of comprehensive analysis on how legal frameworks governing herbivorous animals and psychotropic substances interact. This gap in legal scholarship hinders the development of coherent policies that address both animal welfare and public health concerns.This study aims to explore the legal contradictions and conflicts between the regulations of herbivorous animals and psychotropic substances. It seeks to identify and analyze the points of contention and the impact these conflicts have on legal practices and policy-making. The analysis reveals significant legal contradictions where the use of animal-derived substances in psychotropic contexts often challenges existing regulations. This misalignment underscores the need for legal reforms that harmonize the treatment of herbivorous animals and the regulation of psychotropic substances.This study introduces a novel perspective by linking animal welfare and psychotropic substance regulation, highlighting the previously underexplored intersections between these domains.The findings suggest a need for interdisciplinary legal reforms and policy adjustments to address the conflicts between these regulatory areas. By bridging the gap between animal welfare laws and psychotropic substance regulations, the study advocates for more integrated and coherent legal frameworks to enhance both public health and animal welfare
HERBIVOROUS ANIMALS AN ULARNING ANALOG AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES CONTRADICT EACH Iskandarovich, Gazibekov Khurshid
International Journal of Business, Law and Political Science Vol. 1 No. 6 (2024): International Journal of Business, Law and Political Science
Publisher : PT. Antis International Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61796/ijblps.v1i6.162

Abstract

The interplay between legal regulations concerning herbivorous animals, their analogs, and psychotropic substances represents a complex and multifaceted issue within legal and ethical frameworks. The legal classification and control of psychotropic substances often clash with the regulation of herbivorous animals and their by-products, leading to significant legal ambiguities and challenges. Herbivorous animals and their by-products are generally subject to regulations that ensure animal welfare, food safety, and environmental protection. In contrast, psychotropic substances are regulated to prevent misuse and protect public health. The overlap and divergence between these regulatory domains highlight a legal conundrum, especially when considering the use of animal-derived products in contexts that intersect with psychotropic substances. Despite existing regulations, there is a notable lack of comprehensive analysis on how legal frameworks governing herbivorous animals and psychotropic substances interact. This gap in legal scholarship hinders the development of coherent policies that address both animal welfare and public health concerns.This study aims to explore the legal contradictions and conflicts between the regulations of herbivorous animals and psychotropic substances. It seeks to identify and analyze the points of contention and the impact these conflicts have on legal practices and policy-making. The analysis reveals significant legal contradictions where the use of animal-derived substances in psychotropic contexts often challenges existing regulations. This misalignment underscores the need for legal reforms that harmonize the treatment of herbivorous animals and the regulation of psychotropic substances.This study introduces a novel perspective by linking animal welfare and psychotropic substance regulation, highlighting the previously underexplored intersections between these domains.The findings suggest a need for interdisciplinary legal reforms and policy adjustments to address the conflicts between these regulatory areas. By bridging the gap between animal welfare laws and psychotropic substance regulations, the study advocates for more integrated and coherent legal frameworks to enhance both public health and animal welfare
SOME ASPECTS OF THE OBJECT AND SUBJECT OF THE CORPUS DELICTI PROVIDED FOR IN ARTICLE 273 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN Iskandarovich, Gazibekov Khurshid
International Journal of Business, Law and Political Science Vol. 1 No. 10 (2024): International Journal of Business, Law and Political Science
Publisher : PT. Antis International Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61796/ijblps.v1i10.220

Abstract

This article investigates the object and subject of the corpus delicti outlined in Article 273 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan, focusing on the legal ramifications surrounding drug-related offenses. General Background: The increasing prevalence of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances has prompted legal reforms to address drug-related crimes effectively. Specific Background: Article 273 identifies various categories of illicit substances, including narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, and their analogues, along with precursors used in their production. Knowledge Gap: However, the absence of a comprehensive list of drug analogues creates ambiguity regarding legal responsibility, complicating the prosecution of offenders under this article. Aims: This study aims to elucidate the generic, specific, and immediate objects of the crime, while critically assessing the implications of undefined analogues in the context of legal accountability. Results: The findings reveal that the lack of clarity regarding the classification of drug analogues may hinder the enforcement of Article 273, resulting in potential challenges in ensuring justice. Novelty: This research contributes to the existing body of knowledge by highlighting the necessity for a precise legal framework that encompasses all forms of narcotic substances and their analogues. Implications: The insights derived from this analysis underscore the urgent need for legislative reform to establish clear definitions and lists of drug analogues, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of the legal system in combating drug-related crimes and protecting public health.
Co-Authors