Lazuardi, Muhammad Fijar
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Road from Surakarta to Yogyakarta: History of Solo-Yogyakarta Road since 16th until 19th century Lazuardi, Muhammad Fijar; Sunjayadi, R. Achmad
HISTORIA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah Vol 13, No 1 (2025): HISTORIA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH METRO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24127/hj.v13i1.10578

Abstract

This article describes the history of the road between Surakarta-Yogyakarta from the 16th until the 19th century. Historically, this road has connected several political entities in Java since the 16th century. By using the historical method, which consists of heuristic, sources criticism, interpretation, and historiography, this research attempts to explain the significance of historical events of the Solo-Yogyakarta Road according to historical records and sources. By doing literature research, this article finds that the Solo-Yogyakarta Road dates back to the establishment of Mataram as Pajang’s vassal. Later in the 17th century, this road became one of the diplomatic roads used by VOC ambassadors to the Mataram's Keraton, until the war of succession clashed in the early 18th century. When Prince Puger occupied the Plered palace in Mataram and Amangkurat III occupied the new palace in Kartasura, this street was also an important setting for several events in the war between the two. Later, the Solo-Yogyakarta road became a pilgrimage route for kings and royal families, so the existence of this road became symbolically important for Mataram's power.
Historiografi Demokrasi dan Masalah Periodisasi Sejarah Indonesia Kontemporer Lazuardi, Muhammad Fijar
Jurnal Sejarah Indonesia Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Sejarah Indonesia
Publisher : Perkumpulan Program Studi Sejarah Se-Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62924/jsi.v7i2.33073

Abstract

The periodization of contemporary Indonesian history is generally divided into three periods, namely the period of Revolution, the Liberal Democracy, the Guided Democracy, the New Order, and the Reformation. Periodization requires accuracy in determining the starting and ending points as well as consistency in the use of terms with historical facts. The Liberal Democracy in this case, there was inaccuracy in the terms used and the temporal scope that had been determined. By using historical methods that emphasize literature study, this research will explain, when the term “liberal democracy” began and what historiographical consequences there would be if that period began in 1950. From the research and analysis that has been carried out, parliamentary democracy is more appropriate to use as a periodization. Liberal democracy can be a concept that accompanies parliamentary democracy. Then the starting point of this period was 1945 when the Workers' Body-Central Indonesian National Committee as a legislative body was formed. The historiographic development of periodization starting in 1950 would miss the democratization process and the ideas of Indonesian actors and agencies at the beginning of independence, as well as the historical continuity between 1945 and 1959.