Harahap, Marie Mahfudz
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analysis of Criminal Law and Islamic Criminal Law on Sanctions for Justice Collaborators: Brigadier Joshua Murder Nasution, Putri Dayani; Harahap, Marie Mahfudz
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 6 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v6i1.213

Abstract

This research examines the role of justice collaborators in murder cases under Indonesian positive law and Islamic criminal law, focusing on the case of Brigadier Joshua’s murder. The study analyzes the regulations for criminal sanctions applied to justice collaborators and explores how Islamic law views such sanctions. The research employs a normative methodology with a comparative approach, utilizing secondary data sources. The findings reveal that while Indonesian law provides for leniency in sentencing justice collaborators, the specific reduction is left to judicial discretion. In the case study, Bharada Richard Eliezer received a significantly reduced sentence for his cooperation. Islamic law similarly allows for forgiveness and sentence reduction, particularly in cases of qisas, diyat, and ta’zir punishments. The study concludes that both legal systems recognize the importance of justice collaborators in uncovering complex crimes, but lack specific regulations on sentence reductions. The authors recommend developing more comprehensive legislation to govern reduced sentences for perpetrator witnesses in both systems.
Analysis of Criminal Law and Islamic Criminal Law on Sanctions for Justice Collaborators: Brigadier Joshua Murder Nasution, Putri Dayani; Harahap, Marie Mahfudz
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 6 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v6i1.213

Abstract

This research examines the role of justice collaborators in murder cases under Indonesian positive law and Islamic criminal law, focusing on the case of Brigadier Joshua’s murder. The study analyzes the regulations for criminal sanctions applied to justice collaborators and explores how Islamic law views such sanctions. The research employs a normative methodology with a comparative approach, utilizing secondary data sources. The findings reveal that while Indonesian law provides for leniency in sentencing justice collaborators, the specific reduction is left to judicial discretion. In the case study, Bharada Richard Eliezer received a significantly reduced sentence for his cooperation. Islamic law similarly allows for forgiveness and sentence reduction, particularly in cases of qisas, diyat, and ta’zir punishments. The study concludes that both legal systems recognize the importance of justice collaborators in uncovering complex crimes, but lack specific regulations on sentence reductions. The authors recommend developing more comprehensive legislation to govern reduced sentences for perpetrator witnesses in both systems.