Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Naditira Widya KALPATARU
Sulistyanto, Bambang
Balai Arkeologi Kalimantan Selatan
Arts Humanities

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
KONFLIK SUMBER DAYA ARKEOLOGI PADA ERA OTONOMI DAERAH Sulistyanto, Bambang
Naditira Widya Vol 3, No 2 (2009): Naditira Widya Vol. 3 No.2
Publisher : Balai Arkeologi Kalimantan Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24832/nw.v3i2.182

Abstract

The benefiting from archaeological resource during the district autonomy era -prior to the reformation era- in Indonesia shows varieties of conflict concerning either the factors which have caused the problems or the actors involved in the conflict. My research suggests that conflict of benefiting from archaeological resources had appeared due to mishmash of several old issue which was developed into new issue as a result of the reformation movement. Old issues which had to be dealt with were the theft, condemnation and destruction of cultural heritage. Such issue occured becauce of clashes of interest between the governments intention to preserve archaeological resources and the basic economic needs of the community surround the site to provide a secure life. Meanwhile, new issues surfaced due to the development of democracy euphoria within the district goverment as the consequence of the commencement of Law number 32 tahun year 2004 concerning District Autonomy. Horizontal conflict between the central goverment in Jakarta and district goverments has emerged in regard to differences of perception on how to give meaning to archaeological resources, which eventually caused differences of interest in benefiting from archaeological resources. Nevertheless, since the commencement of the reformation era in Indonesia, the people have been expreriencing enlightenment beyond expetation. Therefore, it is not surprising that the people of Indonesia show admirable response to deal with problem solving in manging the archaeological resources; they are more proactive and even demand their rights to be involved in managing the archaeological resources, which are essentially belong to the people of Indonesia. This article discusses the conflict resolution in a cultural management resourch approach.
WARISAN BUDAYA SEBAGAI BARANG PUBLIK: Cultural Heritage as Public Property Sulistyanto, Bambang
KALPATARU Vol 27, No 1 (2018)
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian Arkeologi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (575.27 KB) | DOI: 10.24832/kpt.v27i1.543

Abstract

Abstract. The basic concept of this research departs from the view that cultural heritage is essentially a property of community, so that it requires public policy to manage it. Based on such perspective, the research was focused on the management of cultural heritage as public properties. The objective of this research is to reveal the management of public property from the aspects of public policy which was primarily derived from the study of scientific literatures and empirical evidences. This research used qualitative and explanative method using public relation model that emphasized on the effort to improve people’s perspective on the image of archaeology. Until today, the hypothesis that cultural heritages are public properties which could be enjoyed unconditionally by the public remains a theory. The research results proved that the hypothesis was correct. Keywords: Policy, public, management, cultural heritage. Abstrak. Konsep dasar penelitian ini berangkat dari pandangan bahwa warisan budaya pada hakikatnya adalah milik masyarakat sehingga dalam pengelolaannya diperlukan kebijakan publik. Berangkat dari konsep di atas, permasalahan penelitian ini adalah “bagaimanakah pengelolaan warisan budaya sebagai barang publik”? Tujuan penelitian ini terfokus pada pengelolaan barang publik ditinjau dari aspek kebijakan publik yang berasal dari berbagai literatur ilmiah dan didukung pengalaman pribadi penulis selama berinteraksi dengan masyarakat. Kajian ini bersumber dari sintesa berbagai hasil penelitian yang telah dilakukan sebelumnya dalam berbagai tema dan topik penelitian. Metode yang digunakan adalah eksplanatif kualitatif dengan pendekatan hubungan masyarakat (public relation model) yang menekankan pada upaya perbaikan image ‘citra’ arkeologi di mata masyarakat. Barang publik untuk rakyat yang semestinya dapat dinikmati secara gratis oleh masyarakat hanya berupa teori. Hasil penelitian ini mengungkapkan bahwa pengelolaan warisan budaya sebagai barang publik tidak bisa sepenuhnya dapat dinikmati oleh masyarakat secara gratis. Kata kunci: kebijakan, publik, pengelolaan, warisan,budaya.
Co-Authors