Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ilmu Hukum Prima
Muhammad Hasbi
Universitas Andalas
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Status of Wills Not Reported by Notaries to the Will Registration Center (Case Study: Decision Number 91/Pdt/2021/PT.PTK) Utami Dinda Verdilla; Muhammad Hasbi; Yussy Adelina Mannas
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v9i1.8291

Abstract

This study examines the legal standing of a notarial will deed not reported to Indonesia's Central Will Registration Center, with a case study of Pontianak High Court Decision No. 91/Pdt/2021/PT.PTK. Using a normative juridical method—statutory, conceptual, and case approaches—the study addresses two questions: (1) what is the regulatory framework for will reporting by notaries? and (2) what were the judges' considerations in Decision No. 91/Pdt/2021/PT.PTK? The study finds that the reporting obligation rests on a hierarchical normative structure: the Civil Code as material law, Law No. 30/2004 as amended by Law No. 2/2014 on the Notary Profession (UUJN) as the obligation-setter, and Minister of Law Regulation No. 16/2025 as the technical instrument. Despite this clear framework, the Pontianak High Court held that a notarial will retains its evidentiary force as an authentic deed even when not reported to the Will Registration Center, because reporting is an administrative obligation of the notary and its omission does not constitute a ground for nullification under existing law. This creates a normative gap that weakens legal certainty for heirs and beneficiaries.
Regulations for Cancellation of a Will with the Existence of Legal Heir Based on Decision Number: 805/PDT/2018/PT.DKI Sepwira Drana Wasistha Putra; Zainul Daulay; Muhammad Hasbi
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v9i1.8292

Abstract

A will deed is an authentic deed made before a Notary pursuant to Article 15(1) of Law No. 30/2004 on the Notary Profession (amended by Law No. 2/2014). Although a notarial will carries perfect evidentiary power, it may be cancelled when it conflicts with the rights of legitimate heirs (legitieme portie). This normative juridical study employs statutory and case approaches to examine: (1) the regulatory framework for cancellation of a will in the presence of legitimate heirs; (2) the judicial considerations in High Court Decision No. 805/PDT/2018/PT.DKI; and (3) the legal consequences of that cancellation for all parties. Results show that cancellation is governed by Articles 875–940 of the Civil Code; the High Court confirmed that Will Deed No. 32 violated the heirs’ absolute share, rendering it without binding legal force; and the consequences include loss of the deed’s evidentiary power, redistribution of the estate to lawful heirs, and potential civil liability for the Notary.
Co-Authors Sepwira Drana Wasistha Putra Utami Dinda Verdilla Zainul Daulay