Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

STRATEGI PENGELOLAAN RISIKO EKONOMI DALAM MENGHADAPI KETIDAKPASTIAN GLOBAL: STUDI DOKUMENTASI PADA KEBIJAKAN EKONOMI INDONESIA Yofa Nurman Sah Putra; Wahyo Wahyo; Zaenal Arifin; Nani Yulia; Muhammad Rozali
Journal of Economic, Bussines and Accounting (COSTING) Vol 7 No 6 (2024): COSTING : Journal of Economic, Bussines and Accounting
Publisher : Institut Penelitian Matematika, Komputer, Keperawatan, Pendidikan dan Ekonomi (IPM2KPE)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31539/costing.v7i6.13424

Abstract

Ketidakpastian ekonomi global telah menimbulkan tantangan besar bagi negara-negara di seluruh dunia, termasuk Indonesia. Faktor-faktor seperti fluktuasi harga komoditas, perubahan geopolitik, pandemi, dan kebijakan moneter dari negara-negara maju telah memengaruhi stabilitas ekonomi nasional. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis strategi manajemen risiko ekonomi Indonesia dalam menghadapi ketidakpastian global. Dengan menggunakan metode dokumentasi, penelitian ini mengkaji berbagai kebijakan ekonomi, termasuk strategi fiskal, moneter, dan perdagangan internasional, untuk mengevaluasi efektivitasnya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun kebijakan pemerintah berhasil menjaga stabilitas di beberapa aspek, masih diperlukan strategi yang lebih adaptif dan proaktif untuk menghadapi tantangan di masa depan. Kebijakan fiskal yang fleksibel, seperti Program Pemulihan Ekonomi Nasional (PEN), memainkan peran penting dalam menjaga konsumsi domestik dan lapangan kerja selama krisis, terutama selama pandemi COVID-19. Kebijakan moneter yang diterapkan oleh Bank Indonesia, termasuk penyesuaian suku bunga dan intervensi di pasar valuta asing, secara signifikan berkontribusi dalam menstabilkan nilai mata uang nasional dan mengelola inflasi.
Comparative Analysis of Pricing and Features of Cloud-Based Accounting Software in Indonesia: A Study of Secondary Data from E-Marketplace Surateman Surateman; Wahyo Wahyo; Jooner Rambe
International Journal of Economics and Management Research Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): December : International Journal of Economics and Management Research
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/ijemr.v4i3.553

Abstract

The development of cloud technology itself has encouraged digitalization in various sectors, including accounting. In Indonesia, for example, more and more businesses—especially micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs)—have begun to switch to using cloud-based accounting software to improve the efficiency, accuracy, and accessibility of financial management. This transition is not only driven by the need for real-time data and automation but also by the increasing availability of affordable internet infrastructure and government support for MSME digital transformation. This study aims to conduct a comparative analysis of the price and main features of four popular cloud accounting software in Indonesia, namely Beecloud, Jurnal by Mekari, Accurate Online, and Kledo. These four platforms have been selected based on their popularity, user base, and relevance for MSMEs in Indonesia. The data for this study was collected secondarily through each provider’s official website and publicly available documentation during the period of May 1–5, 2025. The method used is a descriptive-comparative quantitative approach, which involves analysis techniques such as descriptive statistics, price-per-feature ratio calculations, and data visualization tools including tables, bar charts, heatmaps, and scatter plots. This approach allows for a comprehensive understanding of both the cost structure and functional range of each product. The results show that there are significant differences in pricing models and the number of features offered. Beecloud SME offers the lowest price-per-feature ratio, suggesting high value for cost-conscious users. On the other hand, Jurnal Enterprise has the highest ratio, indicating a more premium pricing strategy that may be more suitable for medium to large enterprises with more complex needs.