Marsudi Dedi Putra
Pascasarjana Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Regulation Of Cybersecurity Technology As An Effort To Address Security Threats To Privacy In The Digital Era Agustinus Wempy; Zaenal Efendi; Marsudi Dedi Putra
JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 10 No 2 (2024): Oktober
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Dehasen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v10i2.6732

Abstract

Cybersecurity technology regulations play a key role in ensuring adequate protection of individual data privacy in an increasingly complex digital era. In the context of the collection, use, and dissemination of personal data by various entities, these regulations provide a foundation for governing practices related to data privacy. Through regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union, stringent standards are enforced to protect personal data and grant individuals control over their data. Transparency, restrictions on data use and access, and the implementation of robust data security measures are key aspects of this regulation. Additionally, law enforcement and sanctions for data privacy violations are integral parts of effective cybersecurity regulations. Thus, cybersecurity technology regulations aim to create a safe and trustworthy digital environment where individual data privacy is respected and optimally protected.
Direct Election Of Regional Heads By The People From A Utilitarian Perspective Krida Kurina Jaya; Hari Wiyanto; Marsudi Dedi Putra
JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 10 No 2 (2024): Oktober
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Dehasen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v10i2.6733

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the direct election of regional heads by the people in the context of utilitarianism theory. This direct election is an integral part of the modern democratic system in many countries, including Indonesia, which gives citizens, especially regional communities, direct voting rights to elect their own regional leaders. However, in the perspective of utilitarianism, political decisions and government actions are measured based on their consequences or impact on the happiness and welfare of society as a whole. Therefore, this research will explore the extent to which a direct regional head election system can be justified from a utilitarianism perspective, taking into account the effectiveness of elected leaders, political participation, and their impact on social and economic justice. Through in-depth analysis, it is hoped that this research can provide deeper insight into the relationship between the direct election of regional heads by the people and the principles of utilitarianism, as well as their implications for the practice of democracy and regional government governance in Indonesia. The results of this research can also provide a valuable contribution in developing more effective and fair policies in the regional head election system, in accordance with the principles of utilitarianism in achieving the welfare of society as a whole.
Measuring Happiness In Utilitarianism Teachings Ulma Roisa Azmi; Eka Rahmawati; Marsudi Dedi Putra
JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 10 No 2 (2024): Oktober
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Dehasen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v10i2.6751

Abstract

This research aims to examine how to measure happiness in the teachings of utilitarianism, an ethical theory that focuses on maximizing the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. The approach used in this research involves qualitative analysis. The qualitative approach includes literature studies to understand the theory of utilitarianism put forward by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, as well as examining various methods of measuring happiness and criticism of utilitarianism. This study finds that although utilitarianism offers a logical framework for moral decision making, there are significant challenges in objectively measuring happiness and its fair application. Happiness is subjective and varies between individuals, with the potential for injustice to occur when the happiness of the majority is prioritized over the minority. A more objective and fair method of measuring happiness is needed, as well as the importance of considering individual rights in applying the principles of utilitarianism by considering overall welfare and distributive justice.
The Convergence Between Textual Law And Progressive Law In Addressing Contemporary Legal Challenges Efendie Efendie; Agus Sugiarto; Marsudi Dedi Putra
JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 10 No 2 (2024): Oktober
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Dehasen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v10i2.6780

Abstract

This article explores the intersection between textual law and progressive law in the context of resolving contemporary legal challenges. Normative law is the choice for this research, with a case and conceptual approach. Collecting legal materials using literature studies and analyzing them using qualitative descriptive. This research produces: Textual law offers legal certainty through strict interpretation of statutory texts, while progressive law emphasizes substantive justice and adaptation to social change. This analysis identifies how these two approaches can complement each other to create a legal system that is fairer and more responsive, and considers community participation in the legal process. Case studies and theoretical contributions support the argument that combining textual legal principles with progressive legal flexibility can increase the effectiveness of law enforcement in dealing with the complexity and dynamics of law in an era of rapid technological development.
THE APPLICATION OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN CONSUMER DISPUTE RESOLUTION BASED ON LAW NUMBER 8 OF 1999 CONCERNING CONSUMER PROTECTION: PENERAPAN ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 8 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN Heristiawan Aryo Wirotomo; Marsudi Dedi Putra
ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Vol. 11 No. 02 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Asosiasi Dosen Hukum Acara Perdata (ADHAPER)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36913/adhaper.v11i02.1

Abstract

Consumer dispute resolution in Indonesia is explicitly regulated under Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection, which provides space for non-litigation settlement through Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). The application of ADR, particularly through the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK), reflects the implementation of the principle of fast, simple, and low-cost justice as mandated in Article 2 paragraph (4) of Law Number 48 of 2009 on Judicial Power. This research employs a normative legal method with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. Data were obtained from literature studies covering legislation, legal doctrines, and relevant court decisions. The results of the study indicate that ADR through BPSK serves as an effective mechanism to provide legal certainty, protect consumer rights, and ensure access to justice, particularly for consumers harmed by business actors. However, the effectiveness of ADR still faces several challenges, including limited human resources, low consumer awareness of ADR mechanisms, and the emerging complexity of disputes in the digital trade sector (e-commerce). Therefore, strategies to improve BPSK’s performance are required through regulatory optimization, the use of digital technology in dispute resolution, and capacity building of human resources, so that ADR mechanisms can become more adaptive, responsive, and relevant to the dynamics of consumer protection in Indonesia.