Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Food Sovereignty For Indonesia: The Epistemological Dimension of Knowledge and Variety of Local Food Sugeng Sugeng; Annisa Fitria
Jurnal Analisis Hukum Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38043/jah.v6i1.4179

Abstract

This article aims to emphasize that food sovereignty policies require the support of knowledge that is not singular.  Epistemological diversity is believed to produce richer and more contextual knowledge of the needs of local communities.  In the process of formulating public policies, scientific knowledge needs to be paired with local knowledge developed through oral traditions. This approach is in accordance with the geographical conditions and natural resources of Indonesia, which has a rich biodiversity and diversity of foodstuffs in various regions.  Indonesia's ethnic diversity and biodiversity are advantages that need to be maintained for sustainable food sovereignty. This philosophical study is useful as a basis for compiling a more comprehensive food sovereignty legal framework.  
Strengthening Sharia Microfinance Regulations And Business Models In Indonesia Sugeng Sugeng; Annisa Fitria; Adi Nur Rohman; Andre Cardenas Jr.
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 13, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.13.1.2024.89-122

Abstract

This article aims to elaborate on the regulation and model of Islamic microfinance in Indonesia. A clear understanding of the types of microfinance and the business model run by Islamic microfinance is needed to answer the problems faced by this institution. Solid and stable Islamic microfinance institutions serve a critical role in increasing access to loans and business capital for the poor and micro-enterprises. So far, the poor have not been reached by formal financial institution programs. This study employs a normative juridical approach using primary and secondary legal documents. The study results show that the role of the sharia supervisory board and the Cooperatives and SMEs Office has not played an optimal role in ensuring the compliance of microfinance managers with sharia principles and values and prudent microfinance management. The presence of regulations and institutions that guarantee sharia microfinance deposits is needed to protect managed funds and increase public trust.
Jurisdiction and Locus Delicti of Transnational Cybercrime: a Normative Study Of International Law and Indonesian Telematics Law Agustinus Nicholas L Tobing; Annisa Fitria
Interdisciplinary Social Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Regular Issue: October-December 2025
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/iss.v5i1.951

Abstract

This study examines the determination of jurisdiction and locus delicti in transnational cybercrime from the perspective of international law and Indonesian telematics law. The borderless nature of cyberspace poses complex challenges for identifying the crime scene (TKP) and enforcing jurisdiction, as perpetrators may operate from one country while causing impacts across multiple states. Using a normative juridical method, the research analyzes primary legal materials such as the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime, the United Nations Convention against Cybercrime (2024), Indonesia’s Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law), Law No. 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection (PDP Law), and the Draft Law on Cybersecurity and Resilience (RUU KKS). Case studies—including cyberattacks on Taiwan (2024–2025), INTERPOL’s 2025 Africa ransomware report, and the 2025 transnational financial crime operation—demonstrate how concurrent and extraterritorial jurisdiction principles apply in practice. The findings indicate that the locus delicti in cybercrime is multifaceted, encompassing the perpetrator’s location, the breached server, and the place where damage occurs. Effective prosecution requires coordination through international cooperation and harmonization of national regulations with global conventions. The study concludes that Indonesia must strengthen its legal framework by ratifying the UN Convention against Cybercrime, adopting concurrent jurisdiction principles, and establishing an inter-agency task force for cross-border investigations to enhance legal certainty and protect national interests in the digital era.