Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.203
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JUSTISI Jurnal Analisis Hukum Interdisciplinary Social Studies Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Hakamain: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies
Annisa Fitria
Universitas Esa Unggul
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Food Sovereignty For Indonesia: The Epistemological Dimension of Knowledge and Variety of Local Food Sugeng Sugeng; Annisa Fitria
Jurnal Analisis Hukum Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38043/jah.v6i1.4179

Abstract

This article aims to emphasize that food sovereignty policies require the support of knowledge that is not singular.  Epistemological diversity is believed to produce richer and more contextual knowledge of the needs of local communities.  In the process of formulating public policies, scientific knowledge needs to be paired with local knowledge developed through oral traditions. This approach is in accordance with the geographical conditions and natural resources of Indonesia, which has a rich biodiversity and diversity of foodstuffs in various regions.  Indonesia's ethnic diversity and biodiversity are advantages that need to be maintained for sustainable food sovereignty. This philosophical study is useful as a basis for compiling a more comprehensive food sovereignty legal framework.  
Strengthening Sharia Microfinance Regulations And Business Models In Indonesia Sugeng Sugeng; Annisa Fitria; Adi Nur Rohman; Andre Cardenas Jr.
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 13, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.13.1.2024.89-122

Abstract

This article aims to elaborate on the regulation and model of Islamic microfinance in Indonesia. A clear understanding of the types of microfinance and the business model run by Islamic microfinance is needed to answer the problems faced by this institution. Solid and stable Islamic microfinance institutions serve a critical role in increasing access to loans and business capital for the poor and micro-enterprises. So far, the poor have not been reached by formal financial institution programs. This study employs a normative juridical approach using primary and secondary legal documents. The study results show that the role of the sharia supervisory board and the Cooperatives and SMEs Office has not played an optimal role in ensuring the compliance of microfinance managers with sharia principles and values and prudent microfinance management. The presence of regulations and institutions that guarantee sharia microfinance deposits is needed to protect managed funds and increase public trust.
Jurisdiction and Locus Delicti of Transnational Cybercrime: a Normative Study Of International Law and Indonesian Telematics Law Agustinus Nicholas L Tobing; Annisa Fitria
Interdisciplinary Social Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Regular Issue: October-December 2025
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/iss.v5i1.951

Abstract

This study examines the determination of jurisdiction and locus delicti in transnational cybercrime from the perspective of international law and Indonesian telematics law. The borderless nature of cyberspace poses complex challenges for identifying the crime scene (TKP) and enforcing jurisdiction, as perpetrators may operate from one country while causing impacts across multiple states. Using a normative juridical method, the research analyzes primary legal materials such as the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime, the United Nations Convention against Cybercrime (2024), Indonesia’s Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law), Law No. 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection (PDP Law), and the Draft Law on Cybersecurity and Resilience (RUU KKS). Case studies—including cyberattacks on Taiwan (2024–2025), INTERPOL’s 2025 Africa ransomware report, and the 2025 transnational financial crime operation—demonstrate how concurrent and extraterritorial jurisdiction principles apply in practice. The findings indicate that the locus delicti in cybercrime is multifaceted, encompassing the perpetrator’s location, the breached server, and the place where damage occurs. Effective prosecution requires coordination through international cooperation and harmonization of national regulations with global conventions. The study concludes that Indonesia must strengthen its legal framework by ratifying the UN Convention against Cybercrime, adopting concurrent jurisdiction principles, and establishing an inter-agency task force for cross-border investigations to enhance legal certainty and protect national interests in the digital era.
The Use of Intellectual Property Rights as Collateral for Debt: Legal Regulations and Valuation Analysis Annisa Fitria; Rita Alfiana; Mira Kartika Dewi Djunaedi; Zummiyanuran Habibi; Alyana Marsyanda
JUSTISI Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v12i1.4680

Abstract

This study aims to examine the legal regulations governing IPR as collateral for debt, and how to determine the valuation of IPR used as collateral. The study method used is normative law with a legislative and conceptual approach. Data was obtained through a literature study of primary and secondary legal materials. The novelty of this study lies in its focus on the legal vacuum and implementation constraints in the field in making IPR, particularly copyright, an object of fiduciary collateral, especially in terms of economic valuation and ownership validity. The results of the study show that although Indonesian fiduciary law has normatively recognized the possibility of using IPR as collateral, in practice financial institutions still face various obstacles. This is partly due to the absence of standard assessment criteria, issues of proof of ownership, and a declarative IPR registration system. The conclusion of this study is that IPR has economic potential and a legal basis as collateral for debt, but it still requires specific derivative regulations and a clear economic value assessment mechanism in order to be widely accepted by financial institutions. The development of this policy is important to support the sustainable financing of the creative economy sector.
Tanggung Jawab E-Commerce Terhadap Konsumen Serta Penerapan Choice of Law dan Jurisdiction Clause dalam Transaksi Lintas Negara: Penelitian Yohanes Christopher June; Annisa Fitria
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Volume 4 Nomor 3 (Januari 202
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jerkin.v4i3.4936

Abstract

This research aims to examine the scope and limits of legal accountability of International e-commerce service providers towards customers in Indonesia, as well as the impact of legal and forum selection provisions in International transactions. Through a normative approach, examining the compatibility between domestic laws and regulations. For example, the Consumer Protection Law and Government Regulation Number 80 of 2019, which includes electronic standard agreements, especially those used by the Amazon platform, reveals that foreign platform providers have a legal obligation to ensure the reliability of their systems and provide accessible dispute resolution procedures. However, legal disparities were identified in Amazon’s standard contract, which unilaterally stipulates the law and jurisdiction of the United States. This provision has the potential to conflict with Article 18 of the Consumer Protection Law. It was concluded that if the clause is not in line with national consumer protection principles, it can be considered legally invalid, and therefore, dispute resolution must refer to Indonesian jurisdiction. Therefore, provisions on choice of law and jurisdiction that conflict with the Consumer Protection Law and Government Regulation Number 80 of 2019 can be declared invalid. Thus, dispute resolution should be returned to the Indonesian legal mechanism and jurisdiction to ensure legal certainty and protect consumer rights.
The Supreme Court as the Guardian of Legality: The Coherence of Judicial Review of Electoral and Presidential Regulations Irmanjaya Thaher; Annisa Fitria; M. Abyan Mufid
Hakamain: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): HAKAMAIN: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies
Publisher : Yayasan Lembaga Studi Makwa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57255/hakamain.v3i2.1774

Abstract

This study examines the Supreme Court’s role as the guardian of legality by evaluating the coherence of judicial review concerning electoral regulations and presidential regulations within Indonesia’s constitutional system. The research focuses on whether the Supreme Court has consistently applied legal principles in reviewing subordinate legislation to ensure conformity with statutory norms, constitutional values, and the rule of law. This study employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Primary legal materials consist of the 1945 Constitution, legislation governing judicial power and lawmaking, Supreme Court decisions, Constitutional Court jurisprudence, and scholarly literature on judicial review and constitutional governance. The findings reveal that although the Supreme Court exercises constitutional authority to review regulations below statutes, inconsistencies remain in judicial interpretation of electoral regulations and presidential regulations, particularly where administrative discretion intersects with democratic governance and constitutional rights. Variations in legal reasoning have contributed to uncertainty regarding the hierarchy of legislation and the uniform application of legal principles. The study further finds that limited harmonization between the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court has weakened the coherence of judicial review and occasionally produced conflicting legal interpretations. To address these challenges, the research argues for the development of consistent interpretative standards, stronger institutional coordination, and greater transparency in judicial reasoning. Harmonizing review procedures and reinforcing the Supreme Court’s constitutional function would enhance legal certainty, strengthen democratic accountability, and preserve the supremacy of the Constitution. Ultimately, coherent judicial review is indispensable for ensuring that electoral regulations and presidential regulations remain consistent with statutory authority, constitutional principles, and the fundamental requirements of a democratic state governed by the rule of law.
Co-Authors Adi Nur Rohman Agustinus Nicholas L Tobing Alfiana, Rita Alyana Marsyanda Andre Cardenas Jr. Irmanjaya Thaher M. Abyan Mufid Mira Kartika Dewi Djunaedi Sugeng Sugeng Sugeng Sugeng Yohanes Christopher June Zummiyanuran Habibi