Articles
<![CDATA[Food Sovereignty For Indonesia: The Epistemological Dimension of Knowledge and Variety of Local Food ]]>
<![CDATA[Sugeng Sugeng]]>;
<![CDATA[Annisa Fitria]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Analisis Hukum Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Pendidikan Nasional ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.38043/jah.v6i1.4179
<![CDATA[This article aims to emphasize that food sovereignty policies require the support of knowledge that is not singular. Epistemological diversity is believed to produce richer and more contextual knowledge of the needs of local communities. In the process of formulating public policies, scientific knowledge needs to be paired with local knowledge developed through oral traditions. This approach is in accordance with the geographical conditions and natural resources of Indonesia, which has a rich biodiversity and diversity of foodstuffs in various regions. Indonesia's ethnic diversity and biodiversity are advantages that need to be maintained for sustainable food sovereignty. This philosophical study is useful as a basis for compiling a more comprehensive food sovereignty legal framework. ]]>
<![CDATA[Strengthening Sharia Microfinance Regulations And Business Models In Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Sugeng Sugeng]]>;
<![CDATA[Annisa Fitria]]>;
<![CDATA[Adi Nur Rohman]]>;
<![CDATA[Andre Cardenas Jr.]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 13, No 1 (2024) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25216/jhp.13.1.2024.89-122
<![CDATA[This article aims to elaborate on the regulation and model of Islamic microfinance in Indonesia. A clear understanding of the types of microfinance and the business model run by Islamic microfinance is needed to answer the problems faced by this institution. Solid and stable Islamic microfinance institutions serve a critical role in increasing access to loans and business capital for the poor and micro-enterprises. So far, the poor have not been reached by formal financial institution programs. This study employs a normative juridical approach using primary and secondary legal documents. The study results show that the role of the sharia supervisory board and the Cooperatives and SMEs Office has not played an optimal role in ensuring the compliance of microfinance managers with sharia principles and values and prudent microfinance management. The presence of regulations and institutions that guarantee sharia microfinance deposits is needed to protect managed funds and increase public trust.]]>
<![CDATA[Jurisdiction and Locus Delicti of Transnational Cybercrime: a Normative Study Of International Law and Indonesian Telematics Law ]]>
<![CDATA[Agustinus Nicholas L Tobing]]>;
<![CDATA[Annisa Fitria]]>
<![CDATA[ Interdisciplinary Social Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Interdisciplinary Social Studies ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Journal Labs ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.55324/iss.v5i1.951
<![CDATA[This study examines the determination of jurisdiction and locus delicti in transnational cybercrime from the perspective of international law and Indonesian telematics law. The borderless nature of cyberspace poses complex challenges for identifying the crime scene (TKP) and enforcing jurisdiction, as perpetrators may operate from one country while causing impacts across multiple states. Using a normative juridical method, the research analyzes primary legal materials such as the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime, the United Nations Convention against Cybercrime (2024), Indonesia’s Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law), Law No. 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection (PDP Law), and the Draft Law on Cybersecurity and Resilience (RUU KKS). Case studies—including cyberattacks on Taiwan (2024–2025), INTERPOL’s 2025 Africa ransomware report, and the 2025 transnational financial crime operation—demonstrate how concurrent and extraterritorial jurisdiction principles apply in practice. The findings indicate that the locus delicti in cybercrime is multifaceted, encompassing the perpetrator’s location, the breached server, and the place where damage occurs. Effective prosecution requires coordination through international cooperation and harmonization of national regulations with global conventions. The study concludes that Indonesia must strengthen its legal framework by ratifying the UN Convention against Cybercrime, adopting concurrent jurisdiction principles, and establishing an inter-agency task force for cross-border investigations to enhance legal certainty and protect national interests in the digital era.]]>
<![CDATA[The Use of Intellectual Property Rights as Collateral for Debt: Legal Regulations and Valuation Analysis ]]>
<![CDATA[Annisa Fitria]]>;
<![CDATA[Rita Alfiana]]>;
<![CDATA[Mira Kartika Dewi Djunaedi]]>;
<![CDATA[Zummiyanuran Habibi]]>;
<![CDATA[Alyana Marsyanda]]>
<![CDATA[ JUSTISI Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): JUSTISI ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33506/js.v12i1.4680
<![CDATA[This study aims to examine the legal regulations governing IPR as collateral for debt, and how to determine the valuation of IPR used as collateral. The study method used is normative law with a legislative and conceptual approach. Data was obtained through a literature study of primary and secondary legal materials. The novelty of this study lies in its focus on the legal vacuum and implementation constraints in the field in making IPR, particularly copyright, an object of fiduciary collateral, especially in terms of economic valuation and ownership validity. The results of the study show that although Indonesian fiduciary law has normatively recognized the possibility of using IPR as collateral, in practice financial institutions still face various obstacles. This is partly due to the absence of standard assessment criteria, issues of proof of ownership, and a declarative IPR registration system. The conclusion of this study is that IPR has economic potential and a legal basis as collateral for debt, but it still requires specific derivative regulations and a clear economic value assessment mechanism in order to be widely accepted by financial institutions. The development of this policy is important to support the sustainable financing of the creative economy sector.]]>
<![CDATA[Tanggung Jawab E-Commerce Terhadap Konsumen Serta Penerapan Choice of Law dan Jurisdiction Clause dalam Transaksi Lintas Negara: Penelitian ]]>
<![CDATA[Yohanes Christopher June]]>;
<![CDATA[Annisa Fitria]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Volume 4 Nomor 3 (Januari 202 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31004/jerkin.v4i3.4936
<![CDATA[This research aims to examine the scope and limits of legal accountability of International e-commerce service providers towards customers in Indonesia, as well as the impact of legal and forum selection provisions in International transactions. Through a normative approach, examining the compatibility between domestic laws and regulations. For example, the Consumer Protection Law and Government Regulation Number 80 of 2019, which includes electronic standard agreements, especially those used by the Amazon platform, reveals that foreign platform providers have a legal obligation to ensure the reliability of their systems and provide accessible dispute resolution procedures. However, legal disparities were identified in Amazon’s standard contract, which unilaterally stipulates the law and jurisdiction of the United States. This provision has the potential to conflict with Article 18 of the Consumer Protection Law. It was concluded that if the clause is not in line with national consumer protection principles, it can be considered legally invalid, and therefore, dispute resolution must refer to Indonesian jurisdiction. Therefore, provisions on choice of law and jurisdiction that conflict with the Consumer Protection Law and Government Regulation Number 80 of 2019 can be declared invalid. Thus, dispute resolution should be returned to the Indonesian legal mechanism and jurisdiction to ensure legal certainty and protect consumer rights.]]>
<![CDATA[The Supreme Court as the Guardian of Legality: The Coherence of Judicial Review of Electoral and Presidential Regulations ]]>
<![CDATA[Irmanjaya Thaher]]>;
<![CDATA[Annisa Fitria]]>;
<![CDATA[M. Abyan Mufid]]>
<![CDATA[ Hakamain: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): HAKAMAIN: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Yayasan Lembaga Studi Makwa ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.57255/hakamain.v3i2.1774
<![CDATA[This article examines the authority of the Supreme Court (MA) of the Republic of Indonesia in exercising the right to judicial review of regulations under the law. The study covers the constitutional and normative foundations of this authority, the demarcation of authority between the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court (MK) within a multi-tiered system of judicial review, the procedural law governing judicial review as stipulated in PERMA No. 1 of 2011, as well as two landmark cases: first, Supreme Court Decision No. 23 P/HUM/2024, which declared that Article 4(1)(d) of PKPU No. 9 of 2020 was inconsistent with Article 7(2)(e) of Law No. 10 of 2016 on Regional Head Elections in the context of age requirements for regional head candidacy; second, a petition for judicial review filed by a citizen challenging several articles in Presidential Regulation No. 82 of 2024 on the Presidential Communications Office (KKP). This article analyzes the constitutional, jurisprudential, and practical implications of these two cases and evaluates the effectiveness of the Supreme Court as the guardian of legality within Indonesia’s legal system.]]>
<![CDATA[Normative Review of EU Unilateral Data Flow Regulation and Non-Discrimination ]]>
<![CDATA[Annisa Fitria]]>;
<![CDATA[Rita Alfiana]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Dinasti Research ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i5.3408
<![CDATA[The rapid expansion of the digital economy has intensified regulatory tensions surrounding cross-border data flows. The European Union’s unilateral measures—particularly the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the adequacy decision mechanism—have reshaped global data governance. While intended to safeguard personal data, these measures raise concerns regarding their compatibility with the principle of non-discrimination under the WTO/GATS framework and their broader implications for international digital trade. This study employs a normative legal research approach, analyzing primary legal sources including the GDPR, WTO/GATS provisions, adequacy decisions, and relevant jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union. It also incorporates comparative policy analysis and doctrinal interpretation to evaluate the trade-related effects of the EU’s unilateral regulatory actions. The research aims to assess whether the EU’s unilateral regulation of cross-border data transfers constitutes a legitimate exercise of regulatory sovereignty or functions as a disguised restriction on trade. It further seeks to examine the extent to which such measures align with the non-discrimination principle in international digital trade law. The findings indicate that although the GDPR’s extraterritorial scope enhances global data protection standards, its compliance requirements impose disproportionate burdens—particularly on developing countries—potentially amounting to non-tariff barriers. Selective adequacy decisions risk undermining multilateralism, contributing to regulatory fragmentation, and widening the global digital divide. This study contributes a normative trade-law perspective to the discourse on EU data governance, critically linking data protection regulation with WTO non-discrimination principles and highlighting the need for more inclusive, transparent, and multilateral digital governance reforms.]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP AHLI KESELAMATAN DAN KESEHATAN KERJA ATAS KETIDAKJELASAN PENGATURAN INSENTIF DI PT. STS ]]>
<![CDATA[Heru Nugroho]]>;
<![CDATA[Zulfikar Judge]]>;
<![CDATA[Annisa Fitria]]>;
<![CDATA[Horadin Saragih]]>;
<![CDATA[Tuti Elawati]]>
<![CDATA[ JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Vol. 9 No. 4 (2026): August 2026 (1) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Smart Education ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.54314/jssr.v9i4.6906
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh belum adanya pengaturan tertulis mengenai insentif bagi Petugas Ahli Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3) di PT. STS, meskipun jabatan tersebut bersifat profesional, tersertifikasi, dan memiliki tanggung jawab serta risiko hukum yang tinggi. Kondisi ini menimbulkan persoalan terkait kepastian hukum dan proporsionalitas sistem pengupahan. Penelitian bertujuan menganalisis bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi Ahli K3 atas ketidakjelasan pengaturan insentif serta tanggung jawab perusahaan dalam pemenuhannya. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan konseptual, menggunakan teori perlindungan hukum dan tanggung jawab hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tidak terdapat ketentuan yang secara eksplisit mewajibkan pemberian insentif khusus bagi Ahli K3 sehingga ketiadaannya bukan pelanggaran hukum positif. Namun, perusahaan tetap berkewajiban menyusun struktur dan skala upah yang adil, rasional, dan proporsional berdasarkan kompetensi, jabatan, dan tanggung jawab kerja. Disimpulkan bahwa insentif bukan hak normatif otomatis, tetapi sistem pengupahan harus mencerminkan risiko dan profesionalitas Ahli K3 guna mencegah ketidakseimbangan hak dan potensi perselisihan hubungan industrial.]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS YURIDIS KEBIJAKAN PENGHAPUSAN SANKSI ADMINISTRASI PAJAK KENDARAAN BERMOTOR DALAM PERSPEKTIF KEPASTIAN HUKUM PROGRAM PEMUTIHAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Ilham Fauzi]]>;
<![CDATA[Zulfikar Judge]]>;
<![CDATA[Dyah Permata Budi]]>;
<![CDATA[Annisa Fitria]]>;
<![CDATA[Tuti Elawati]]>
<![CDATA[ JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Vol. 9 No. 4 (2026): August 2026 (1) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Smart Education ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.54314/jssr.v9i4.6923
<![CDATA[Abstract: This study aims to analyze the legal framework governing the policy of eliminating administrative sanctions on Motor Vehicle Tax (PKB) through a tax amnesty program and its impact on taxpayer compliance and Regional Original Revenue (PAD) at the West Jakarta Samsat Office. The research applies theories of Administrative Law, particularly the General Principles of Good Governance, as well as public policy theory. A normative legal research method combined with an empirical approach was employed through literature review and interviews with relevant officials. The findings indicate that the policy has a clear legal basis in regulations concerning regional taxes and local government authority in tax administration. Its implementation involves the temporary removal of penalties for late tax payments. Empirical data show that the policy increases motor vehicle tax payments and contributes to higher regional revenue. The study concludes that the policy is effective in improving tax payments and regional revenue in the short term. However, its implementation should be selective and accompanied by strengthened tax administration systems to prevent a decline in taxpayer compliance in the long term. Keyword: motor vehicle tax, tax amnesty, regional original revenue. Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaturan hukum kebijakan penghapusan sanksi administrasi Pajak Kendaraan Bermotor (PKB) melalui program pemutihan pajak kendaraan bermotor serta dampaknya terhadap kepatuhan wajib pajak dan Pendapatan Asli Daerah (PAD) di Samsat Jakarta Barat. Kajian dilakukan menggunakan teori Hukum Administrasi Negara, khususnya Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik, serta teori kebijakan publik. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan empiris melalui studi kepustakaan dan wawancara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan penghapusan sanksi administrasi PKB memiliki dasar hukum yang jelas dalam peraturan mengenai pajak daerah dan kewenangan pemerintah daerah. Implementasinya dilakukan melalui penghapusan denda keterlambatan pembayaran pajak dalam periode tertentu. Secara empiris, kebijakan ini terbukti meningkatkan jumlah pembayaran PKB dan memberikan kontribusi terhadap peningkatan PAD. Meskipun efektif dalam meningkatkan penerimaan daerah dalam jangka pendek, kebijakan ini perlu diterapkan secara selektif dan disertai penguatan sistem administrasi perpajakan guna menjaga kepatuhan wajib pajak dalam jangka panjang. Kata kunci: pajak kendaraan bermotor, pemutihan pajak, pendapatan asli daerah.]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Data Biometrik Peserta BPJS dalam Implementasi Face Recognition Technology Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Perlindungan Data Pribadi ]]>
<![CDATA[Rivaldy Archarelly Rompis]]>;
<![CDATA[Annisa Fitria]]>
<![CDATA[ Arus Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora Vol 6 No 2: Agustus (2026) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Arden Jaya Publisher ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.57250/ajsh.v6i2.3243
<![CDATA[Pemanfaatan teknologi Face Recognition pada sistem FRISTA BPJS Kesehatan meningkatkan efisiensi verifikasi peserta Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN), namun juga menimbulkan tantangan terhadap perlindungan data biometrik. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis penerapan mekanisme persetujuan, transparansi, dan akuntabilitas berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi (UU PDP), serta mengkaji pertanggungjawaban hukum BPJS Kesehatan sebagai pengendali data pribadi Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual melalui studi kepustakaan yang dianalisis secara deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemrosesan data biometrik peserta wajib memenuhi prinsip persetujuan eksplisit, transparansi, akuntabilitas, dan keamanan sebagaimana diatur dalam UU PDP. Pertanggungjawaban BPJS Kesehatan berada pada ranah administrasi dan perdata apabila terbukti lalai memenuhi kewajiban perlindungan data, sedangkan pertanggungjawaban pidana pada prinsipnya dibebankan kepada pelaku peretasan sepanjang tidak terdapat keterlibatan pihak internal.]]>
