Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Implementation of the Article 32 of Government Regulation Number 24 of 2016 Concerning Land Deed Official Honorarium: Study at the land deed official office located in the working area in situbondo Malik Hariyanto; Prija Djatmika; Diah Aju Wisnuwardhani
Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan Vol. 5 No. 2: Nov 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Jember, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/jik.v5i2.52971

Abstract

The regulation regarding honorarium does not mention a definite amount or proportion, but only determines the upper limit preceded by the word “may not exceed” 1% (one percent) of the transaction price stated in the deed as stipulated in Article 32 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation No. 24 of 2016 amending Government Regulation No. 37 of 1998 on the Regulation of the Position of Land Deed Makers. This certainly raises problems related to the absence of certainty regarding the amount of honorarium so that it allows for differences in rates between PPATs with one another. This research was conducted with the aim of revealing whether the implementation of the determination of PPAT honorarium carried out by a PPAT at the PPAT Office located in the Working Area in Situbondo is in accordance with the provisions of Law Number 24 of 2016 Article 32 concerning PPAT Honorarium and the factors that hinder the implementation of Article 32 of Law Number 24 of 2016 concerning PPAT honorarium. This research is designed using juridical-empirical research methods. The results of this study indicate that the implementation of honorarium in Situbondo district is not fully in accordance with the provisions of Article 32 of Law Number 24 of 2016 concerning PPAT honorarium. Factors causing obstacles to the implementation of the provisions of Law Number 24 of 2016 Article 32 concerning PPAT Honorarium in Situbondo because the rules do not also provide a salary for the PPAT. KEYWORDS: Honorarium, PPAT, Deed
The Urgency of Electronically Storing Notary Protocol Archives Documents in the Concept of Progressive Law in Indonesia Dana Ayu Fitrianingrum; Tunggul Anshari Setia Negara; Diah Aju Wisnuwardhani
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES Vol 9, No 2 (2025): International Journal on Language, Research (Law) Education Studies
Publisher : State Islamic University of North Sumatra Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijlres.v9i2.25524

Abstract

The development of information technology has encouraged transformation in the practice of notarial administration, including the urgency of digitizing notary protocol storage. This research aims to analyze the legal needs of the e-documents storage system in a progressive legal perspective, emphasizing the regulatory vacuum and the urgency of norm reconstruction. Using a normative juridical approach and qualitative analysis of legal documents as well as the results of previous studies, it is found that the absence of explicit regulation in the Notary Office Law regarding digital archives creates legal uncertainty and evidentiary risks. This study argues that electronic-based storage of notarial protocols should be recognized as a normative necessity in line with the principles of expediency and legal certainty. The conclusion of this study confirms the importance of new regulations that provide legitimacy to notary e-documents as part of the state's responsibility in realizing efficient, fair, and accountable legal services.