Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Khazanah : Journal of Islamic Studies INJIES: Journal of Islamic Education Studies
Pakhrurrozi Pakhrurrozi
Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia
Religion Education Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Ad-Dakhil Bi Al-Isyarah dalam Kitab Qayyum Al-Asma’ Karya Shirazi: Kajian Terhadap Bentuk dan Penyimpangannya Ilham Abiyusuf; Fadhli Maulana Ihsan; Pakhrurrozi Pakhrurrozi; Lukmanul Hakim; Nixon Nixon
Khazanah : Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Volume 5 Nomor 2 Mei (2026)
Publisher : Pusdikra Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51178/khazanah.v5i2.3439

Abstract

The emergence of new religious movements such as Bábism, which claim to have alternative sources of revelation outside the Qur'an, particularly through the Qayyum al-Asma' by Sayyid 'Ali Muhammad Shirazi (the Báb). The aim of this study is to identify and analyze forms of deviant esoteric interpretation (ad dakhil bil isyarah) in this book, specifically in Surah 93 pages 192-193, and to compare them with interpretations from mainstream Qur'anic exegesis (tafsir). The research employs a qualitative method with a library research approach and descriptive-analytical design. Data collection was conducted by tracing and recording texts from the original manuscript of Qayyum al-Asma', while data analysis used content analysis and comparative analysis through five steps: identifying the Báb's claims, describing his interpretation, collecting comparator interpretations, comparative analysis, and ad dakhil bil isyarah analysis. The findings reveal three forms of ad dakhil bil isyarah deviation in Qayyum al-Asma': the symbol of qamis (shirt) claimed as a medium for transmitting spiritual authority and blood as a sacrament of salvation; the symbol of al-nahl (bee) transforming honey into an "elixir" of life; and the symbol of al-nar wa al-nur (fire and light) at Mount Thur, where the Báb claimed himself as the entity that spoke to Prophet Moses. These three deviations contradict the authoritative interpretations of Ibn Kathir, Al-Qurtubi, Al-Mishbah, Jalalain, and the Indonesian Ministry of Religious Affairs.
Critical Analysis of The Rejection of Richard Bell's Thoughts on The Translation of The Qur'an in The Context of Orientalism Ilham Abiyusuf; Muhammad Hafizi; Pakhrurrozi Pakhrurrozi; Wahyu Saputra; Edi Hermanto
INJIES: Journal of Islamic Education Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): December
Publisher : STKIP Pesisir Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34125/injies.v1i2.6

Abstract

Richard Bell is a well-known English orientalist who focuses his research on the Qur'an with a critical academic approach. Bell's approach involves methods of historical, linguistic, and critical analysis to understand the Quran in historical and cultural contexts. However, this approach raises rejection from Muslim scholars who believe that the Bell method is inadequate to understanding the true meaning of the Quran as divine revelation. this study is to study the rejection of the approach of Richard Bell in the interpretation of the Qur'an by Muslim scholars and scientists. The main objective is to understand the basics of the arguments used in this denial and to evaluate its compatibility with the basic principles in interpreting the Quran according to the Islamic tradition. This research methodology uses a qualitative approach with methods of document analysis. Data is obtained from literature that deals with the works and approaches of Richard Bell, as well as texts that explain the views of Muslim scholars and academics on the interpretation of the Qur'an. The analysis was conducted to identify points of rejection of the Bell method and to evaluate the underlying arguments. Muslim scholars reject Richard Bell's approach to the Quran because they believe it doesn't fully respect the Quran as divine revelation. They think his methods are too focused on history and criticism, not capturing the Quran's true meaning. They prefer interpretations that consider the context of revelation, Prophet Muhammad's explanations, and see the Quran as a unified whole. They also doubt Bell's historical criticism and say Western academic methods have limits in understanding religious texts. Overall, they find Bell's approach doesn't fit Islamic principles of Quran interpretation.The rejection of Richard Bell's approach to the interpretation of the Qur'an is based on the belief that its historical and critical methods are insufficient to understand the true meaning of this sacred text.
Co-Authors Edi Hermanto Fadhli Maulana Ihsan Ilham Abiyusuf Lukmanul Hakim Muhammad Hafizi Nixon Nixon Wahyu Saputra