Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum
Yos Johan Utama
Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
An Analysis of Justice in Tapera Based on the Perspective of Jurgen Habermas' Critical Theory and John Rawls' Theory of Justice Kusuma Firdaus; Yos Johan Utama; Aju Putrijanti
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 002 (2024): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.5062

Abstract

Government Regulation Number 21 of 2024 was designed and issued to help Indonesian people who need financial support to own their first home. However, a few days after the regulation was enacted, the People's Housing Savings (Tapera) policy drew criticism from the public. This program is considered to burden low-income workers and is not fair enough for people from the middle to upper income group. This research aims to apply both theories, namely Jurgen Habermas's Critical Theory and John Rawls' Theory of Justice in the context of the Tapera Program.This research is a normative legal research using a statute approach. Data collection was carried out through literature studies of various legal sources and journals about Tapera.  The results of the study show that based on the perspective of Jurgen Habermas's Critical Theory and John Rawls' Theory of Justice, he emphasizes the importance of transparency, active participation, and protection of individual rights in the implementation of Tapera's policies. Based on Habermas' perspective, an inclusive public space is needed to ensure the participation of all parties in discussions and decision-making related to Tapera, with the aim of achieving social justice through rational communication. Meanwhile, Rawls' theory of justice emphasizes equal access to basic opportunities and a fair distribution of benefits for Tapera participants, regardless of social or economic status. The evaluation of Tapera's policies needs to consider these aspects to ensure justice in accordance with the social and democratic principles advocated by these two theories.
Execution of The Right to be Forgotten in Indonesia: The Urgency of the Requirements for the Determination and Establishment of the Assessment Body Trisoko Sugeng Sulistyo; Yos Johan Utama; Aju Putrijanti
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 002 (2024): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.5596

Abstract

The Right to be Forgotten has been recognized in the Information and Electronic Transactions Law (ITE) and the Personal Data Protection Law (PDP), but has not been regulated in detail. The ITE Law and the PDP Law do include provisions on the right to be forgotten, but there is no specific explanation of the conditions that must be met to establish what rights can be removed as part of the Right to Be Forgotten. In addition, there is no special assessment body tasked with determining and assessing these conditions. This ambiguity causes the implementation of the Right to be Forgotten to be hampered in Indonesia. This journal aims to provide recommendations for policymakers to improve related regulations so that the implementation of the Right to be Forgotten can run effectively in Indonesia so that it has benefits for law enforcement in Indonesia. The method used in this journal is normative juridical research with a statute approach. The results of the study show that in order for the implementation of The Right to be Forgotten to be more effective, it is necessary to prepare clearer determination requirements and the establishment of an independent assessment body that can handle applications fairly and transparently.
Co-Authors Aju Putrijanti Kusuma Firdaus Trisoko Sugeng Sulistyo