Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Sustainable Law ⁠International Journal of Asian Pacific Community Service
Tries Edy Wahyono
universitas kristen cipta wacana
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Advanced Assistance in Scientific Manuscript Preparation Using Artificial Intelligence (AI), Google Scholar, and Reference Management Tools to Strengthen Students’ Academic Literacy and Publication Moch. Amrodji; Agung Hariadi; Hendrik Richard; Tries Edy Wahyono
⁠International Journal of Asia Pacific Community Service Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Kristen Cipta Wacana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71131/1v47tk27

Abstract

This community service program aimed to strengthen students’ academic literacy and improve the quality of scientific publications through advanced assistance in scientific manuscript preparation using Artificial Intelligence (AI), Google Scholar, and reference management tools. The activity involved undergraduate students and was conducted through training sessions, guided practice, and intensive mentoring focused on literature searching, citation management, academic paraphrasing, and manuscript organization. AI-based tools were introduced to support idea development, language refinement, and academic writing efficiency while maintaining research ethics and originality. The implementation results indicated increased student understanding of scientific writing techniques, improved ability to manage references systematically, and higher confidence in preparing publication-oriented manuscripts. Participants were also able to utilize digital academic resources more effectively in supporting evidence-based writing. Overall, the program contributed positively to enhancing students’ academic competencies and fostering a sustainable culture of scholarly writing in higher education.
Law Students’ Perceptions of Victims’ Rights Protection in the Implementation of Restorative Justice under Law Number 20 of 2025 on the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code Tries Edy Wahyono; Eka Sudibya; Hendrawan Nurcahyo
International Journal of Sustainable Law Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Kristen Cipta Wacana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71131/hp3d0e49

Abstract

Restorative justice has become part of Indonesia’s criminal procedure reform through Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code. This study examined law students’ understanding of victims’ rights protection and their perceptions of the distinction between voluntary reconciliation and pressured settlement in restorative justice proceedings. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, the study involved two law students from universities in Malang selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through interviews and analysed through data reduction, data display, thematic categorisation, and conclusion drawing. The findings showed that both participants viewed restorative justice as a process that should prioritise victim recovery, offender accountability, and the restoration of social relationships. Victims were regarded as active rights-holders entitled to information, meaningful participation, legal assistance, protection from intimidation, and material and non-material recovery. Both participants rejected the view that a signed peace agreement automatically proves voluntary consent. Voluntary reconciliation was associated with informed and freely given consent, whereas pressured settlement involved direct threats and indirect influences, including family persuasion, community expectations, economic vulnerability, institutional pressure, emotional exhaustion, and unequal social status. The study concludes that restorative justice should be assessed by whether victims are genuinely heard, protected, restored, and able to decide independently.
Co-Authors Agung Hariadi Eka Sudibya Hendrawan Nurcahyo Hendrik Richard Moch. Amrodji