Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.497
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Meraja journal International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Jurnal Sosial Sains dan Komunikasi (Ju-SoSAK)
Mukmin Muhammad
ITBA Al Gazali Barru
Religion Humanities Chemistry Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 9 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 9 Documents
Search

 1 
BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE APPLICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS FOR FOREIGNERS VIOLATING VISITATION VISAS IN INDONESIA (A STUDY OF LAW NUMBER 9 OF 1992 ON IMMIGRATION) Mukmin Muhammad
Meraja journal Vol 7 No 3 (2024): Vol 7 No 3 ( 2024 )
Publisher : P3M Stia Al Gazali Barru and Meraja media

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33080/mrj.v7i3.397

Abstract

[Full Paper] to pdf Copyright (c) 2024 Meraja journal
BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE FOOD ESTATE PROGRAM: ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, AGRARIAN CONFLICTS, AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS FOR INDONESIA’S FOOD SECURITY M. Rasda; Mukmin Muhammad
Meraja journal Vol 8 No 1 (2025): Vol 8 No 1 ( 2025 )
Publisher : P3M Stia Al Gazali Barru and Meraja media

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33080/mrj.v8i1.404

Abstract

[Full Paper] to pdf Copyright (c) 2025 Meraja journal
The Effect of Feed Variation and Maintenance Duration on Harvest Weight of Mud Crabs in a Vertical Crab House System M. Rasda; Rahmayati HM; Mukmin Muhammad
Meraja journal Vol 8 No 2 (2025): Vol 8 No 2 ( 2025 )
Publisher : P3M Stia Al Gazali Barru and Meraja media

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33080/mrj.v8i2.437

Abstract

[Full Paper] to pdf Copyright (c) 2025 Meraja journal
Financial Feasibility Analysis of Mud Crab (Scylla spp.) Farming Business in Tanete Rilau District, Barru Regency Rasda .; Nur Alam Kasim; Mukmin Muhammad
Meraja journal Vol 8 No 3 (2025): Vol 8 No 3 ( 2025 )
Publisher : P3M Stia Al Gazali Barru and Meraja media

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33080/mrj.v8i3.442

Abstract

[Full Paper] to pdf Copyright (c) 2025 Meraja journal
COMMUNITY PURCHASING MOTIVATION TOWARD LOCAL FOOD PRODUCTS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY USING NVIVO IN BARRU REGENCY M. Rasda; Ratnawati; Mukmin Muhammad
Meraja journal Vol 9 No 1 (2026): Vol 9 No 1 ( 2026 )
Publisher : P3M Stia Al Gazali Barru and Meraja media

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33080/mrj.v9i1.483

Abstract

[Full Paper] to pdf Copyright (c) 2026 Meraja journal
Sustainable Rice Farming Under Fertilizer Subsidy Policies: Assessing The Economic, Social, And Environmental Impacts Rasda Rais; Seniorita; Mukmin Muhammad
Meraja journal Vol 9 No 2 (2026): Vol 9 No 2 (2026)
Publisher : P3M Stia Al Gazali Barru and Meraja media

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33080/mrj.v9i2.528

Abstract

[Full Paper] to pdf Copyright (c) 2026 Meraja journal
Global Research Development on the Digital Economy and Rural Economic Growth: Syamsiah; Mukmin Muhammad
Meraja journal Vol 9 No 2 (2026): Vol 9 No 2 (2026)
Publisher : P3M Stia Al Gazali Barru and Meraja media

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33080/mrj.v9i2.550

Abstract

[Full Paper] to pdf Copyright (c) 2026 Meraja journal
Assessing the Implementation of Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) Based on Good Governance Principles in Ensuring Legal Certainty of Land Rights in Indonesia Nurdin; Mukmin Muhammad
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): on Progress
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v6i4.5614

Abstract

This study aims to assess the implementation of the Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) program based on good governance principles in ensuring legal certainty of land rights in Indonesia. The research employs a qualitative method with a socio-legal approach, focusing on the empirical context of PTSL implementation in Barru Regency. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with officials of the National Land Agency (BPN), community participants, field observations, and document analysis. The collected data were systematically analyzed using NVivo 12 Pro to identify key themes related to governance practices, legal certainty, institutional roles, and implementation challenges.The findings indicate that the implementation of PTSL has generally adhered to structured administrative and technical procedures, including document verification, land measurement, and digital registration systems. The application of good governance principles is reflected in transparency through public outreach, accountability in procedural compliance, and participation involving local governments and communities. However, the study also identifies several persistent challenges, such as inaccuracies in legacy land certificates, overlapping land claims, and limitations in public administrative readiness, which may hinder the effectiveness of the program.Furthermore, the PTSL program has significantly contributed to strengthening legal certainty by formalizing land ownership, reducing the potential for disputes, and enhancing the socio-economic value of land. Legal certification provides stronger protection of property rights and facilitates access to economic resources, including financial services. Nevertheless, the sustainability and success of the program depend on accurate data submission, continuous institutional supervision, and strengthened coordination among stakeholders.In conclusion, the implementation of PTSL based on good governance principles plays a vital role in ensuring legal certainty of land rights in Indonesia. This study recommends improving data validation mechanisms, enhancing community awareness, and reinforcing institutional collaboration to optimize the effectiveness and long-term impact of the program
Judicial Governance in Administrative Oversight: A Comparative Study of the Indonesian Constitutional Court and the Dutch Raad van State Mukmin Muhammad; Syamsiah Syamsiah
Jurnal Sosial Sains dan Komunikasi Vol. 4 No. 02 (2026): Jurnal Sosial Sains dan Komunikasi, 2026
Publisher : SEAN Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines how constitutional and administrative courts shape judicial governance in supervising administrative power through a comparative analysis of the Indonesian Constitutional Court and the Dutch Raad van State. The research is motivated by the increasing expansion of administrative discretion, which requires stronger judicial mechanisms to ensure accountability, legality, and proportionality in public administration. Employing a qualitative doctrinal approach, this study analyzes twelve Constitutional Court decisions and ten landmark decisions of the Dutch Raad van State using comparative legal analysis. The findings reveal three principal dimensions of judicial governance. First, accountability review emphasizes constitutional responsibility for governmental decision-making and legislative processes. Second, proportionality review strengthens judicial control over administrative discretion by balancing public interests and individual rights. Third, legality review ensures that administrative authorities remain bound by constitutional principles and statutory mandates. The Dutch experience demonstrates a mature proportionality doctrine that evolved after the childcare benefits scandal, while the Indonesian Constitutional Court increasingly integrates constitutional accountability into administrative governance through conditional unconstitutional decisions and procedural constitutional review. Based on these findings, the study develops a Judicial Governance Model consisting of Accountability Review, Proportionality Review, and Legality Review as an integrated framework for democratic administrative oversight. The model contributes theoretically to administrative governance literature by bridging constitutional adjudication and administrative justice within a unified governance perspective.
Co-Authors M. Rasda M. Rasda M. Rasda Nur Alam Kasim Nurdin Rahmayati HM Rasda . Rasda Rais Ratnawati Seniorita Syamsiah Syamsiah Syamsiah