Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

EXAMINING THE REGULATIONS GOVERNING OFFSHORE DECOMMISSIONING IN FIVE COUNTRIES ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES Saputra, Eno; Anggara, Ari; Husaini, Husaini; Salasa, Ricco; Haryadi, Donni; Rafik, M.; Fikri, KMS Novyar Satriawan
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Literature Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND LITERATURE
Publisher : Yayasan Education and Social Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53067/ijomral.v4i1.290

Abstract

In the decades ahead, the decommissioning of offshore structures worldwide will remain a persistent issue, as numerous structures will surpass their expiration or become unproductive when reservoirs are no longer utilized. This article analyzes the global offshore decommissioning legal framework and summarizes the rules in countries recognized for their expertise in decommissioning, specifically the UK, Norway, and the USA. The oil-producing nations of Malaysia and Thailand in Southeast Asia are examined to uncover potential deficiencies in decommissioning legislation for countries at the nascent decommissioning stage. The distinctions were recognized regarding decommissioning preparation, technical execution of decommissioning, supplementary environmental standards, and the financial security framework. In conclusion, most legislation about the technical sector is analogous throughout all examined countries. Significant distinctions exist between two primary philosophies of the framework: a prescriptive regime and a goal-setting regime. Other decommissioning facets garner heightened scrutiny, including the elucidation of in situ decommissioning, residual liabilities, the optimization of financial considerations associated with decommissioning, and the transfer of waste from offshore to onshore. The deficiencies in the current framework can be addressed by adopting an evidence-based approach in its development
COVID-19, PANDEMI BAYANGAN, DAN AKSES TERHADAP KEADILAN BAGI KAUM MUDA KORBAN KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA Saputra, Eno; Anggara, Ari; Husaini, Husaini; Salasa, Ricco; Haryadi, Donni; Rafik, M.; Fikri, KMS Novyar Satriawan
Bhinneka Multidisiplin Journal Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Bhinneka Multidisiplin Journal
Publisher : Yayasan Education and Social Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53067/bmj.v2i2.21

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has co-existed alongside a far less visible “shadow pandemic” of violence against women, with COVID-19 impacting the number and complexity of domestic violence cases and enabling new tactics for coercive control. This article provides a preliminary assessment of the extent to which Canada’s responses to the COVID-19 pandemic have prioritized the safety of women and children, with a focus on the courts and women’s access to justice. We examine court directives and judicial decisions triaging which cases would be heard as “urgent,” as well as courts’ decisions on the merits in cases involving domestic violence and COVID-19, spanning the areas of family, child welfare, criminal law, and civil protection orders. In the sixty-seven reported decisions in our sample, we find very little awareness overall of the heightened risks for survivors during COVID-19, in keeping with the prepandemic tendency of decision makers to focus on incident-based physical violence instead of patterns of coercive control. Our analysis also suggests that survivors’ability to  prove domestic violence and secure court orders that would help to ensure their safety was hampered not only by procedural complexity but also by the reduced availability of a range of services—health, counselling, housing, and supervised access centres, for example as a result of COVID-19