Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

OPTIONS FOR REGULATING LABOR IN THE GIG ECONOMY: WHAT ARE THEY? Supriadi, Dedi; Saprizon, Saprizon; Putri, Aslina; Wirnawan, Frendli; Afandi, Ahmad; Alpian, Alpian; Fikri, KMS. Novyar Satriawan
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Literature Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND LITERATURE
Publisher : Yayasan Education and Social Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53067/ijomral.v4i1.292

Abstract

Traditional labor regulations and employment standards are complicated by the features of paid work associated with digital platform businesses, such as taxi, delivery, and maintenance roles. This article evaluates the scope of this. The types of employment in Indonesia and their primary attributes subsequently examine the relevance of current employment regulations to these gig jobs, referencing Australian and international legislation and jurisprudence. Significant ambiguity exists over the extent of conventional legislation, minimum requirements, and remedies in the domain of irregular digitally mediated employment. Regulators and legislators should evaluate methods to enhance and broaden the regulatory framework overseeing gig work. The article identifies five principal options: enforcing current laws, clarifying or broadening definitions of 'employment,' establishing a new category of 'independent workers,' granting rights to 'workers' rather than employees, and reevaluating the notion of an 'employer.' We evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of these methods and encourage authorities to use innovative and ambitious strategies to enhance the minimum standards and conditions for workers in these circumstances
KETIMPANGAN PERLINDUNGAN ANAK DI JAKARTA : GRADIEN SOSIAL DAN 'HUKUM INTERVENSI TERBALIK' Supriadi, Dedi; Saprizon, Saprizon; Putri, Aslina; Wirnawan, Frendli; Afandi, Ahmad; Alpian, Alpian; Fikri, KMS. Novyar Satriawan
Bhinneka Multidisiplin Journal Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Bhinneka Multidisiplin Journal
Publisher : Yayasan Education and Social Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53067/bmj.v2i2.51

Abstract

Contact with child protection systems are a key site of the expression of social inequalities, yet research into the size and nature of this relationship remains sparse in Jakarta system context. This article reports on a study of the relationships between child protection system contact and small area-level deprivation. Using a national linked dataset including all children with system contact in 2013–14, (n =13,851 children) it found there is a marked relationship between deprivation and system contact, and significant differences between regions for all three outcomes of interest. Compared to children living in the least deprived quintile of small areas, children in the most deprived quintile had, on average, 13 times the rate of substantiation, 18 times the rate of a family group conference, and 6 times their chance of placement in foster care. There was limited evidence for the ‘inverse intervention law’ that proposes that children in similarly deprived small areas have higher rates of child protection system contact if they live in less deprived regions (larger areas). The pattern of placements showed the strongest support for this law, with children in similarly deprived small areas having, on average, almost twice the rate of placement if they lived in less deprived regions compared to more deprived regions. These findings have implications for policy, as they suggest a need to apply an inequalities perspective to child protection similarly to health inequities. Specifically, action is needed to address the causes of deprivation, provide services that respond to families living in poverty, address biases, and undertake further research to examine the interactions between demand and supply of services between similar deprivation levels.