Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Perluasan Kompetensi Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Mengadili Tindakan Faktual Pemerintah Stephanie Angela Penu; Jeffry A. Ch. Likadja; Yohanes G. Tuba Helan
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 6 (2024): November: Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v1i6.595

Abstract

Decisions and decrees as legal instruments of the government in carrying out legal actions unilaterally, can be the cause of legal violations for citizens, in Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Courts and its amendments, the law explains that the object of state administrative disputes is that which contains legal actions that can have legal consequences for a person or civil legal entity, at least there is ease for the public to sue the government and request the cancellation of decisions made by the government, but due to the expansion of objects in Law Number 30 of 2014 Article 87 letter (a) includes written decisions, it also includes factual actions. Therefore, the problem formulation in this research is whether the state administrative court has the authority to adjudicate factual government actions that harm the community, how legal protection for people who are harmed by factual government actions. This research is a normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, historical, and doctrinal approaches that apply to determine the rule of law as a whole. The results showed that the expansion of the competence of the State Administrative Court to adjudicate factual actions of the government is not competent because it cannot cause legal consequences because it is not in line and contradicts what is regulated in Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Courts and its Amendments, the public does not get legal protection through the State Administrative Court as a result of the factual actions of State Administrative bodies/officials. Suggestions from this research are that factual actions should be removed or eliminated from the competence of the State Administrative Court and there is no need to expand the object of State Administrative disputes, for people who feel harmed by factual actions of State Administrative bodies/officials should file a lawsuit against the law to the district court.
Legalitas Pendaftaran Investasi Asing pada Sistem Online Single Submission Risk Based Approach (Oss-RBA) di Indonesia Jesycha Nasrani Lussy; Jeffry A. Ch. Likadja; Elisabeth N.S. Bota Tukan
Federalisme: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Federalisme : Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/federalisme.v1i4.230

Abstract

This study aims to find out and analyze the legality of foreign investment registration in the online single submission risk based approach (Oss-RBA) system in Indonesia. This research is a normative research using primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials collected by tracing or searching and documentation studies, the legal materials that have been collected are processed and analyzed in several stages, namely inventory, identification, classification and systematization. The results of the study show that (1) Law Number 25 of 2007 concerning investment has been in compliance with TRIMs. (2) Foreign investment business licenses in the Oss-RBA system are not considered to violate TRIM's because they are not regulated in the illustration of the violation of the TRIM's agreement.
FUNGSI SATUAN POLISI PAMONG PRAJA DALAM PENERTIBAN PELACURAN DI KOTA KUPANG Juan M.M. Ndun; Kotan Y. Stefanus; Cyrilius W.T. Lamatoro; Jeffry A. Ch. Likadja
Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi (Januari 2026) In Press
Publisher : PT. Hasba Edukasi Mandiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71282/jurmie.v3i1.1503

Abstract

Prostitution is a form of social pathology that poses serious challenges to public order, social stability, and moral values. Within the framework of regional autonomy, local governments are authorized to address prostitution through regional regulations and administrative law enforcement carried out by regional apparatuses, particularly the Civil Service Police Unit (Satpol PP). In Kupang City, prostitution control is regulated by Regional Regulation Number 39 of 1999 concerning the Control of Prostitution Sites. This study aims to analyze the regulatory framework governing the functions of Satpol PP in controlling prostitution in Kupang City, examine the implementation of prostitution control measures, and identify factors that hinder the effectiveness of these functions. This research employs a normative-empirical juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches. Data were collected through interviews, observations, and literature reviews. The findings indicate that although Satpol PP has implemented preventive and repressive measures, the control of prostitution has not been optimal. Major obstacles include weak regional regulations that are not responsive to modern forms of prostitution, limited human resources and budgetary support, and low levels of public legal awareness. The study concludes that effective prostitution control requires regulatory reform, institutional strengthening of Satpol PP, and more comprehensive and sustainable policy approaches.