Yuliasry, Issy
English Education Journal

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Observance of Cialdini’s Principles of Speech Act of Persuasion in 2016 us Presidential Debates Arisetiyani, Yenika; Yuliasry, Issy
English Education Journal Vol 7 No 3 (2017)
Publisher : English Education Journal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/eej.v7i3.20742

Abstract

Persuasion is an important factor to politicians to show the power and influence the people. In the United States Presidential Election, debate is one of the tools to convey the candidates message. Most of the utterances used in debates aimed at affecting and convincing the audiences or the voters. Persuasion according to Searle (1979) is regarded as a directive speech act in which the speaker’s intention is to make the hearers to commit him or herself to perform some form of action. Most of the researchers conducted persuasive speech acts from the point of view of discourse. There is no study about natural data like debates. This study is a study about observance of Cialdini’s principles of speech acts of persuasion in 2016 US presidential debates. Therefore, there are six principles that must be observed, namely consistency, authority, reciprocity, social-evidence, preference/ liking and rareness/ scarcity. It used descriptive qualitative method to get the findings. The findings of the study are proved that most of the presidential candidates observed Cialdini’s principles. They used several ways like asking the voter’s need, making a promise, and disfiguring the interlocutors. Finally, this thesis provides suggestion regarding to the findings. At this point, the first plan is to present some tested principles of persuasion in debate classes. Next point is how you might use the principles to increase community interest in your topic, and to win people over, fairly and ethically, to the way of thinking.
The Translation of Ideologies in the English – Indonesian Translation of Twains “The Adventure of Tom Sawyer” Rochmawan, Muhammad Rizky; Yuliasry, Issy; Wuli Fitriati, Sri
English Education Journal Vol 8 No 2 (2018): June 2018
Publisher : English Education Journal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/eej.v8i3.22619

Abstract

This thesis was focused on the rendering of ideologies in the English – Indonesian Translation Twain’s The Adventure of Tom Sawyer. The main purposes of the study was to explain the rendering of ideologies found in the English – Indonesian translation in the Twain’s novel The Adventure of Tom Sawyer which was realized through the rendering of ideologically-contested words, nominalization and voice. This study used descriptive qualitative study by means of Critical Discourse Analysis framework proposed by Fairclough (1989). The analysis was done by analyzing the ideologically-contested words, nominalization and voice found in the sentences where ideologies were embedded. This was also done by getting through the analysis of micro-level, meso-level and macro-level of Critical Discourse Analysis. The results of the study showed the way the ideological differences between the source language and target language were renderred, such as: tacit assumption, belief system and value system. Most of the ideologies were rendered into target language, while only few were shifted as the result of choosing the words, nominalizing the clause and changing the voice. The results of the study are expected to give a valuable contribution to the translator, English Department students and lecturers and writers to consider the rendering of ideologies in the literary works, in order to raise ideological awareness embedded on the source language and to succeed rendering the ideologies by considering the socio-cultural condition.