Primasari, Imas Khaeriyah
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TANAH DI DESA GUNUNGSARI MELALUI MEDIASI BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 30 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DAN ARBITRASE Primasari, Imas Khaeriyah; Alpiyah, Nur
Yustitia Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): Yustitia
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/yustitia.v10i1.244

Abstract

This research discusses the problem of land disputes in Gunungsari village between Mr. Sukasa and Mr. Ari, in which Mr. Ari claimed ownership of land from Mr. Sukasa and resulted in a land dispute. The specification of this research is Descriptive Law with a Normative Juridical Approach Method by examining secondary data material as a basis for research, then conducting a search for regulations and literature related to the problem under study. The results of this study indicate that land disputes can be resolved by mediation or out-of-court settlement, the dispute resolution process through mediationis an effort to resolve disputes through negotiation with the help of a neutral third party (mediator) to find a form of settlement that can be agreed upon by the parties or the community in dispute in Gunungsari Village. The result of the dispute resolution process through mediation is an agreement or peace agreement that both have evidentiary value and are binding for the parties. Both do not yet have definite legal force as befits a court decision with permanent legal force. Peace agreements or agreements resulting from outof-court mediation only gain the status of a deed of peace after the parties with the help of a mediator file a lawsuit for peace through the District Cour. Article 36 of PERMA Number 1 Year 2016. Thus, the peace deed has legal certainty and permanent legal force (incracht van gewijsde). Out-of-court dispute resolution through the mediation process needs to be developed to resolve civil disputes. In addition, each court should have certified mediator judges to make it easier for the parties to carry out mediation in court and obtain clear legal certainty such as a peace deed that has permanent legal force from the agreement of the parties to the dispute.
Failure of Mediation Implementation In District Court Primasari, Imas Khaeriyah
Gema Wiralodra Vol. 16 No. 1 (2025): Gema Wiralodra
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/gw.v16i1.808

Abstract

This study discusses the failure of mediation implementation in district courts, aiming to identify the factors behind these failures. The research was motivated by the frequent unsuccessful mediation processes in district courts. Using a qualitative approach with descriptive analysis, the study found that the main cause of mediation failure in district courts is legal culture, which can be divided into external and internal factors. Internally, many mediator judges are indifferent, lack seriousness, and treat mediation merely as a formality in fulfilling their duties. Externally, parties involved often prioritize prestige, ego, and self-esteem, believing it is more honorable to proceed to trial rather than settle through mediation.