Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal Evidence Of Law
Werembinan, Petrus Carol
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Keabsahan Visum Et Repertum dan Visum Psikiatrikum sebagai Alat Bukti dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan Werembinan, Petrus Carol; Cahyo Nugroho, Widhi
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v3i3.772

Abstract

This research aims to determine the legal strength of Visum et Repertum and Visum Psikiatrum as evidence in rape cases. Essentially, rape is an unlawful act, and criminal law classifies it as a criminal offense (rechtsdelicten). This study uses literature as its primary material, referred to as normative legal research or library research. The role of expert testimony in relation to the completeness of evidence in legal documents examined in court is very useful in enhancing the judge's confidence in the decision-making process. Visum et Repertum is considered a reliable form of evidence provided by a sworn doctor in criminal cases. The evidentiary status of Visum et Repertum in criminal cases is classified as documentary evidence under Article 184 paragraph (1) letter c and Article 187 letter c of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code, with expert testimony as per Article 1 number 28 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Stb 1937-350, along with Article 184 paragraph (1) letter b of the Criminal Procedure Code. The results of this research indicate that Visum et Repertum has legal strength as evidence in rape cases, as regulated under Article 184 paragraph (1) and Article 187 letter c.
Co-Authors Cahyo Nugroho, Widhi