Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JUSTISI Konstitusi: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Riesta Yogahastama
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Perbandingan Tanggung Jawab Pemerintah Daerah dalam Pelestarian Warisan Budaya Takbenda oleh Unesco : (Studi Kasus Reog Ponorogo dan Wayang Yogyakata) Shela Sulis Cahyani; Riesta Yogahastama
Konstitusi : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Konstitusi : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/konstitusi.v2i3.701

Abstract

This study aims to compare the responsibilities of the local governments of Ponorogo Regency and the Special Region of Yogyakarta in preserving the intangible cultural heritage of Reog Ponorogo and Yogyakarta’s Wayang Kulit after their recognition by UNESCO. The study addresses the issue of how cultural preservation efforts are implemented in both regions. This research employs a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches to analyze national and local regulations as well as their implementation. The findings indicate that Yogyakarta has established strong local regulations, active community participation, and institutional support through education and the economic empowerment of artists. In contrast, Ponorogo Regency continues to face challenges related to the regeneration of cultural practitioners, weak local regulations, and reliance on ceremonial-based preservation approaches. This study underscores the importance of legal integration, social participation, and institutional support in the sustainable preservation of cultural heritage.
Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad for not Fulfilling Incentives for the Protection of Sustainable Food Agriculture Land Riesta Yogahastama; Bahri, Syaiful; Mohammad Habib Ramdhani
JUSTISI Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v11i1.3642

Abstract

The regulation of sustainable food agricultural land, especially regarding incentives as an effort to prevent high conversion of functions, the government has the authority to provide incentives as a form of determination from government officials regarding restrictions on agricultural land owned by the community. In practice, the provision of incentives by the government is often not fulfilled, resulting in injustice for the community, even though the regulations explicitly regulate the provision of incentives. this article aims to, How is legal protection for the community regarding incentives for the protection of Sustainable Food Agriculture Land? what is the model of lawsuit against government officials if compensation is not fulfilled in the protection of Sustainable Food Agricultural Land? The type of research used is legal research with statute approach, conceptual approach. This research is prescriptive in nature which aims to provide arguments for the results of the research that has been conducted. The results of this study indicate that legal protection for farmers if their incentives are not fulfilled has not been concretely regulated in Law Number 41 of 2009 concerning the Protection of Sustainable Food Agricultural Land, besides that farmers in accessing justice experience difficulties due to the unregulated and also complicated arrangements regarding the provision of incentives. Also, when farmers experience losses from the non-fulfillment of incentives, they file a lawsuit for compensation, due to provisions that are not fulfilled by government officials as a result of the LP2B policy. Therefore, in law enforcement it is important to reconceptualize so that access to justice for people whose incentives are not fulfilled by the government can make claims against actions taken by the government. Keywords : Law Enforcement, Justice, Incentives
Co-Authors Mohammad Habib Ramdhani Shela Sulis Cahyani SYAIFUL BAHRI