Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of English Language and Culture
Mahardika, Agustine Andriana Ayu
Bunda Mulia University
Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
THE LECTURERS’ WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN WRITING CLASSES: UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ OPINIONS AND PREFERENCES Witari, Putu Sita; Mahardika, Agustine Andriana Ayu
Journal of English Language and Culture Vol 15, No 1 (2024): Journal of English Language and Culture
Publisher : Universitas Bunda Mulia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30813/jelc.v15i1.6303

Abstract

Writing in English for university students who use English as their second or foreign language can be challenging. This is not only because of the linguistic aspects that may be different from their first language but also because of the non-linguistic aspects such as the content, knowledge, and structure. For such cases, the involvement of a lecturer in their learning process is essential and this can be done by providing written corrective feedback (WCF) to their writing. In order to investigate the university students’ opinions of written corrective feedback and the types of it that are preferred in their writing classroom, this study hence is conducted to gain a better understanding from the students’ point of view. By implementing mixed-method research, the findings revealed major outcomes. Results showed that students generally felt positive about receiving WCF, as it helped identify errors, progress, and weaknesses. However, they felt that WCF alone was insufficient, and a combination of written corrective feedback and verbal feedback was more beneficial. Moreover, the students prefer direct feedback over indirect feedback to build awareness and knowledge about their writing process. They are impartial towards metalinguistic feedback and prefer correction forms with explanations. Lecturers' writing feedback develops critical thinking and revision strategies, encouraging students to research and read widely. Future studies could include longitudinal studies with teacher and student opinions, class observation, and technological advancements, aiming to stimulate new perspectives on written corrective feedback in EFL classrooms.
INCORPORATING CRITICAL LITERACY IN ELT: IMPROVING INDONESIAN STUDENTS’ CRITICAL THINKING AND WRITING ENGAGEMENT Mahardika, Agustine Andriana Ayu; Silalahi, Ronald Maraden Parlindungan
Journal of English Language and Culture Vol 15, No 2 (2025): Journal of English Language and Culture
Publisher : Universitas Bunda Mulia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30813/jelc.v15i2.8300

Abstract

This research investigates how critical literacy is applied in an English Language Teaching (ELT) context and how it promotes students’ critical thinking, engagement, and writing expression. Employing a qualitative case study approach, the researchers converged data through observation and semi-structured interviews with four participants from a private university in North Jakarta. It is shown that critical literacy guides students to examine social and political topics from various points of view, improves their classroom engagement, and assists the growth of organized and logical written arguments. Instead of simply emphasizing on enhancing writing details, this research focuses the function of critical literacy as a pedagogical approach that enable students to think intensely, communicate convincingly, and captivate with real-world topics in meaningful ways.
Co-Authors Silalahi, Ronald Maraden Parlindungan Witari, Putu Sita