Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Journal Of Law Sciences (Legisci)
Ismiati, Saptosih
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Harmonization of The Role of Religious and State Justice Institutions in Handling Victims of Domestic Violence Ismiati, Saptosih; Widjanarto, Haswar; Wafa Azizah, Ersya Aqila
Jurnal Legisci Vol 2 No 2 (2024): Vol 2 No 2 October 2024
Publisher : Ann Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62885/legisci.v2i2.477

Abstract

Domestic abuse is a subject of public law, thereby transcending the private sphere of the marital relationship and necessitating official intervention in its resolution. Domestic violence falls under criminal law, although divorce pertains to civil family law, resulting in two distinct legal processes in the divorce settlement that follow incidents of domestic abuse. Law Number 23 of 2004 addresses the Elimination of Domestic Violence, serving as the inaugural legislative framework that explicitly safeguards victims of domestic violence offenses. This study employs a descriptive-analytical research methodology. This study employs a normative juridical approach, utilizing literature and secondary data as the foundation for research, which involves an examination of relevant laws, regulations, and literature pertinent to the research process. Simultaneously, the analysis employed in this study methodology is qualitative legal.  This study concluded that the Religious Court lacks the authority to adjudicate domestic violence cases, as it does not possess jurisdiction over public law matters. In addressing community needs, the majority of domestic violence cases are promptly adjudicated for divorce in the Religious Court without prior resolution in the District Court. Consequently, harmonization between the Religious Court and the District Court is necessary for the resolution and adjudication of divorce cases involving domestic abuse. Immediate formulation of clear and tangible regulations is necessary to address divorce cases stemming from domestic abuse, namely by granting the Religious Court the competence to adjudicate matters pertaining to public law, particularly those involving domestic violence.
Wage Discrimination Against Women PAUD Teachers Ismiati, Saptosih; Wafa Azizah, Ersya Aqila
Jurnal Legisci Vol 1 No 5 (2024): Vol 1 No 5 April 2024
Publisher : Ann Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62885/legisci.v1i5.240

Abstract

PAUD instructors typically work with a female student body. This is because, from a societal standpoint, women are viewed as kind, meticulous people, making this work appropriate for them. PAUD instructors are entitled to a wage structure that guarantees their economic and social well-being until their earnings are insufficient. In terms of norms, the government has established laws that ensure the rights of all workers; nonetheless, social differences in women's earnings continue to exist. It would, therefore, remain challenging to address the issue of PAUD teachers' low pay if the regulations are set solely by statutory regulations and no steps are taken to ensure its implementation.
Implementasi Pasal 34 Ayat (2) Uud 1945 Dikaitkan dengan Penangkapan Petani di Madiun dan Stigma Inovasi di Indonesia Saputra, Wisnu; Ismiati, Saptosih
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i6.5575

Abstract

Penelitian berjudul Implementasi Pasal 34 Ayat (2) Undang-Undang Dasar 1945Dikaitkan Dengan Penangkapan Petani Di Madiun Dan Stigma Inovasi Di Indonesia, membahas adanya ketidakharmonisan regulasi inovasi di dalam sektor pertanian dengan praktik penegakan hukum terhadap petani di Indonesia. Regulasi di Indonesia telah mendukung kegiatan inovasi, namun implementasi di lapangan terhambat oleh pendekatan hukum yang formalistik, maka amanat konstitusi pada Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Pasal 34 ayat (2) tidak terwujud. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan spesifikasi deskriptif-analitis serta metode analisis yuridis kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan ketidakjelasan definisi “petani kecil” dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2019 tentang Sistem Budi Daya Pertanian Berkelanjutan, berdampak pada penerapan pasal pengecualian administratif yang tidak konsisten, sehingga membuka ruang kriminalisasi terhadap inovasi petani. Tindakan kepolisian dalam kasus ini dianggap lalai menjalankan fungsi pengayoman sesuai Pasal 13 huruf c Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian. Diperlukan harmonisasi regulasi dan pendekatan hukum yang lebih humanistik untuk menjamin perlindungan HAM serta mendukung tercapainya tujuan Indonesia Emas 2045.
Co-Authors Wafa Azizah, Ersya Aqila WIDJANARTO, HASWAR WISNU SAPUTRA