Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Majapahit Journal of Islamic Finance dan Management Majapahit Journal of Islamic Finance dan Management
Rosadi, M. Imron
Unknown Affiliation
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Implementing Conditional Cash Transfers: a Qualitative Analysis of Facilitators and Barriers Rosadi, M. Imron; Budi Helpiastuti, Selfi; Kuswandi, Aos
Majapahit Journal of Islamic Finance and Management Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): Islamic Finance and Management
Publisher : Universitas KH. Abdul Chalim Mojokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31538/mjifm.v5i4.629

Abstract

This paper analyzes the effectiveness of Indonesia’s conditional cash transfer flagship programme, the Family Hope Program (PKH), in local level implementation. By examining the Bantaran District in Probolinggo Regency, it examines how communication, resources, implementer attitudes, and bureaucratic formalism affect programme performance. A qualitative case study: in‐depth interviews with 17 purposively sampled informants, programme facilitators, community leaders, and beneficiary families. In addition, field observations were made and programme reports, as well as local rules, were analysed. The results also show a strong implementation gap: while the PKH is institutionally embedded, there are clear constraints to its transformative potential. Crucial bottlenecks include a lack of facilitator capacity, problems with the communication process that cause beneficiaries to misunderstand conditionality, and very instrumental (rather than substantive) beneficiary compliance. A highly centralized bureaucracy and ongoing targeting inaccuracies also undermine the programme's credibility. An innovation of the study is to combine several strands of evidence to examine CCT implementation at the sub-district level, suggesting that, as Edwards (1998) observed, his variables are interactive and ecosystemic in nature. It points to an “implementation paradox” in which operational viability reinforces marginal developmental effects. The study provides evidence-based recommendations for re-jigging implementation systems and an analytical lens suitable for other social protection programmes in developing countries.
Implementing Conditional Cash Transfers: a Qualitative Analysis of Facilitators and Barriers Rosadi, M. Imron; Budi Helpiastuti, Selfi; Kuswandi, Aos
Majapahit Journal of Islamic Finance and Management Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): Islamic Finance and Management
Publisher : Universitas KH. Abdul Chalim Mojokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31538/mjifm.v5i4.629

Abstract

This paper analyzes the effectiveness of Indonesia’s conditional cash transfer flagship programme, the Family Hope Program (PKH), in local level implementation. By examining the Bantaran District in Probolinggo Regency, it examines how communication, resources, implementer attitudes, and bureaucratic formalism affect programme performance. A qualitative case study: in‐depth interviews with 17 purposively sampled informants, programme facilitators, community leaders, and beneficiary families. In addition, field observations were made and programme reports, as well as local rules, were analysed. The results also show a strong implementation gap: while the PKH is institutionally embedded, there are clear constraints to its transformative potential. Crucial bottlenecks include a lack of facilitator capacity, problems with the communication process that cause beneficiaries to misunderstand conditionality, and very instrumental (rather than substantive) beneficiary compliance. A highly centralized bureaucracy and ongoing targeting inaccuracies also undermine the programme's credibility. An innovation of the study is to combine several strands of evidence to examine CCT implementation at the sub-district level, suggesting that, as Edwards (1998) observed, his variables are interactive and ecosystemic in nature. It points to an “implementation paradox” in which operational viability reinforces marginal developmental effects. The study provides evidence-based recommendations for re-jigging implementation systems and an analytical lens suitable for other social protection programmes in developing countries.
Co-Authors Aos Kuswandi Budi Helpiastuti, Selfi