Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN
Hizkia, John Michael
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Applicability of Constitutional Court Decision Number 118/PUU-XX/2022 Regarding the Statute of Limitations for Document Forgery in Relation to the New Criminal Code Hizkia, John Michael
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 6 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Constitutional Court Decision Number 118/PUU-XX/2022 altered the policy for calculating the statute of limitations for the crime of document forgery; however, the implementation of the new Criminal Code does not reflect this change. This study employs a normative approach, using a literature review to analyze the applicability of the Constitutional Court’s decision to the new Criminal Code, which does not incorporate this change. The findings of the study indicate that, based on the principle of lex posterior derogat legi priori, the current regulations still adhere to Constitutional Court Decision 118/2022, as the new Criminal Code will not take effect until 2026. Should a material review related to this article arise in the future, the Constitutional Court must apply the principle of similia similibus to ensure justice and prevent discrimination, thereby guaranteeing equal treatment for all individuals under the law
The Applicability of Constitutional Court Decision Number 118/PUU-XX/2022 Regarding the Statute of Limitations for Document Forgery in Relation to the New Criminal Code Hizkia, John Michael
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 6 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v6i2.236

Abstract

Constitutional Court Decision Number 118/PUU-XX/2022 altered the policy for calculating the statute of limitations for the crime of document forgery; however, the implementation of the new Criminal Code does not reflect this change. This study employs a normative approach, using a literature review to analyze the applicability of the Constitutional Court’s decision to the new Criminal Code, which does not incorporate this change. The findings of the study indicate that, based on the principle of lex posterior derogat legi priori, the current regulations still adhere to Constitutional Court Decision 118/2022, as the new Criminal Code will not take effect until 2026. Should a material review related to this article arise in the future, the Constitutional Court must apply the principle of similia similibus to ensure justice and prevent discrimination, thereby guaranteeing equal treatment for all individuals under the law
Co-Authors