Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.778
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Madani: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal Socius: Social Sciences Research Journal
Sunusi, Muh. Nur Taufiq
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Muhkam Mutasyabih Kartono, Arsy Fathir; F, Fatmawati; Sunusi, Muh. Nur Taufiq
Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Vol 2, No 6 (2025): January
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In this paper, we will discuss further about Muhkam and Mutasyabah in the interpretation of the Al-Qur'an, as well as how Islamic religious experts understand and apply these concepts in the interpretation process. We will also discuss how Muhkam and Mutasyabah influence the interpretation of the Qur'an and how they help Islamic schoalars understand the meaning of the Qur'an better. In the process of interpretation, Islamic religious experts must understand the differences between Muhkam and Mutasyabah. They must understand that the Muhkam verses have a clear and undeniable meaning, while the Mutasyabah verses have meanings that can be interpreted differently. By understanding these differences, Islamic religious experts can carry out more accurate and deeper interpretations, thereby understanding the meaning of the Qur'an better. 
Kaedah-Kaedah Ushul Pengertian dan Jenis Nya Madina, Siti; F, Fatmawati; Sunusi, Muh. Nur Taufiq
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 3, No 1 (2025): February
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Schools of Writing Usul Fiqh After as-Syafi'i, many scholars began to compile books on ushul fiqh. Some summarized it, while others discussed it at length. Then two schools of thought emerged in writing ushul fiqh, the theological school (ahlu al-kalam) and the Hanafi school. Each uses a different method. From this background, the author sees that Imam Syafi'i had knowledge of the two schools of thought that differed, so he was indeed the right person to be the first to write a book on the science of ushul. In addition to Ar-Risalah, Imam Syafi'i also has other works on the science of ushul, such as: the book Jima'ul-ilmi, Ibthalul-istihsan, and Ikhtilaful-hadith. From this study, it was found that the rules of ushuliyah are guidelines or basic rules used to istinbath (take) sharia law from existing evidence. The goal is to achieve human welfare through the establishment of laws in accordance with sharia principles. The principles of Usuliyah are an important methodology in the science of ushul fiqh which functions to explore and establish sharia law from its sources, such as the Qur'an and Sunnah.
A Usul al-Fiqh Study of the Imperative (Amr) and Its Legal Implications in Qur’anic Verses and Hadith: An Analysis of Contemporary Fiqh J, Jumriani; F, Fatmawati; Sunusi, Muh. Nur Taufiq
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 3, No 12 (2026): January
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18137790

Abstract

The study of the term Amar (command) is one of the important topics in ushul fiqih, as determining the meaning of syar’i law largely depends on the understanding of commands found in the Qur'an and Hadith. Experts have differing views on whether the term Amar indicates an absolute obligation, merely a recommendation, or just permission. This article aims to explore the foundation of the term Amar, its application in verses and Hadith, and its legal implications in the context of modern fiqih. The research method used is literature review with a textual and contextual analysis approach. The results show that most ushul scholars agree that the term Amar essentially indicates obligation, unless there is a qarinah that diverts that meaning. However, in modern fiqh, the legal impact of Amar is greatly influenced by maqasid al-shariah and social situations. This emphasizes that the understanding of Amar needs to be flexible while still being grounded in the principles of classical ushul fiqh.
Sharih and Kinayah Expressions in Scriptural Texts: An Analysis of Meaning, Application, and Their Legal Implications in Usul al-Fiqh Fausya, Annisa; F, Fatmawati; Sunusi, Muh. Nur Taufiq
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 3, No 12 (2026): January
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18087677

Abstract

Within the field of Ushul Fiqh, the notions of lafaz sharih (explicit expression) and lafaz kinayah (implicit expression) serve as crucial tools in the derivation of Islamic law. A sharih statement is regarded as explicit, unambiguous, and limited to a single meaning, thus generating legal consequences automatically without the need for supporting evidence such as intention or contextual clues. Conversely, kinayah refers to indirect or ambiguous language that may invite multiple interpretations, making its legal application contingent upon the speaker’s intention and surrounding context. Classical jurists, including al-Ghazali, al-Amidi, Ibn Qudamah, and al-Syathibi, underscored this distinction by classifying sharih as qath’i al-dilalah (definitive in indication) and kinayah as zanni al-dilalah (probabilistic in indication). Using a descriptive-analytical framework and library-based research, this study examines both traditional sources and modern contributions. The analysis demonstrates that the distinction between sharih and kinayah plays a pivotal role in various domains such as family law—particularly divorce and marriage contracts—commercial agreements, and the interpretation of Qur’anic and Hadith texts. Furthermore, while kinayah is often preferred for its politeness in communication, sharih provides greater legal certainty. This divergence influences the scope of ijtihad and the ethical dimension of social interactions.
Co-Authors Fatmawati F, Fatmawati Fausya, Annisa J, Jumriani Kartono, Arsy Fathir Madina, Siti