Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Comparative Analysis of Fuzzy Logic Models for Depression Prediction: Python and LabVIEW Approaches Rismayanti, Nurul; Titaley, Gilberth Valentino; Handayani, Anik Nur
Indonesian Journal of Data and Science Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024): Indonesian Journal of Data and Science
Publisher : yocto brain

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56705/ijodas.v5i3.189

Abstract

Depression is one of the mental disorders with a significant impact on individuals' quality of life and productivity. The diagnostic process for depression, which typically relies on subjective assessment, often encounters challenges of uncertainty and variability in symptoms. This study aims to develop a fuzzy model for predicting depression levels based on five primary symptom variables: worthlessness, concentration, suicidal ideation, sleep disturbance, and hopelessness. The model is implemented on two platforms, Python and LabVIEW, to evaluate the accuracy and consistency of prediction results between these platforms. The analysis process begins with data preprocessing, input variable fuzzification, inference using 243 fuzzy rules, and defuzzification to generate a crisp output value classified into four depression levels: No Depression, Mild, Moderate, and Severe. The study results indicate a very small error margin between the two platforms, with error values below 0.01 in each trial. These findings suggest that both Python and LabVIEW can produce nearly identical and consistent predictions. This conclusion supports the effectiveness of fuzzy logic in addressing uncertainty in clinical data, especially for cases of depression with varying symptoms. Nonetheless, there are limitations related to the subjectivity in selecting membership functions and rules, as well as limitations in the number of variables used. Therefore, this study recommends expanding the developed fuzzy model with additional variables or integrating it with machine learning approaches to improve prediction accuracy. These findings are expected to serve as a foundation for the development of fuzzy-based systems in future mental health diagnostics.
Performance Comparison of Ensemble Learning Models for Brain Tumor Detection on Augmented MRI Datasets Titaley, Gilberth Valentino; Rismayanti, Nurul; Handayani, Anik Nur; Ardiansah, Jevri Tri
ILKOM Jurnal Ilmiah Vol 17, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Prodi Teknik Informatika FIK Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33096/ilkom.v17i2.2523.86-97

Abstract

Brain tumors are highly fatal diseases, making early detection a critical factor in improving patient survival rates. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has become a primary tool in brain tumor diagnosis; however, manual analysis processes are often time-consuming and prone to subjective errors. This study employs a machine learning-based classification model to detect four categories of brain tumors—glioma, meningioma, pituitary, and healthy—with high accuracy. The methods include image segmentation using the U-Net model, which excels in medical image analysis due to its encoder-decoder architecture with skip connections, allowing efficient integration of spatial and contextual information. Features are extracted using HuMoments, known for their invariance to rotation, translation, and scale, ensuring robust spatial pattern representation. Data normalization is conducted using Robust Scaling and L2 Normalization to address outliers and harmonize feature scales, enhancing model performance. The MRI dataset, originally comprising 7,023 images, was augmented to 8,000 images using techniques such as rotation, flipping, and contrast adjustments to improve class balance and minimize overfitting. Three ensemble algorithms—Random Forest, XGBoost, and Stacking—were employed to train the models, with performance evaluation based on accuracy, ROC-AUC, F1-score, and confusion matrix. The results demonstrate that Random Forest achieved the best performance with an accuracy of 72% and an ROC-AUC of 0.91. This study illustrates the potential of machine learning approaches for automated brain tumor diagnosis, with further improvement possible through model optimization and the use of more diverse datasets.