Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Tarikhuna: Journal of History and History Education Historiography HISTORIA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah KRONIK: Journal of History Education and Historiography
Firdiyansyah, Mohammad Masrudin
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Konflik agraria dalam dua era: Resistensi masyarakat lokal Kelurahan Singosari, Gresik, terhadap Perusahaan Listrik Negara pada periode Orde Baru dan Reformasi, 1992-2006 Firdiyansyah, Mohammad Masrudin
Historiography: Journal of Indonesian History and Education Vol 4, No 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17977/um081v4i42024p478-494

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to examine the causes of local community resistance in Singosari Village, Gresik, to the construction of Extra High Voltage Transmission Lines (SUTET) by the State Electricity Company (PLN) during the 1992-2006 period, as well as the strategies employed by the residents in defending their rights. The historical method is applied in this research, which includes heuristics, source verification, interpretation, and historiography. The sources used include academic articles, theses, newspapers, and oral interviews with historical figures. The findings show that the conflict was triggered by differing perceptions between PLN and the residents regarding health impacts, land rights, and the economic value of the land traversed by the SUTET. The residents employed various resistance strategies, such as filing complaints, forming alliances, and submitting legal lawsuits. Despite these efforts, the community's resistance did not succeed in changing PLN's stance, which adhered to the principles of legality and claims of national interest. Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji penyebab resistensi masyarakat lokal di Kelurahan Singosari, Gresik, terhadap pembangunan Saluran Udara Tegangan Ekstra Tinggi (SUTET) oleh Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN) selama periode 1992-2006, serta strategi yang digunakan warga dalam memperjuangkan hak mereka. Metode sejarah digunakan dalam penelitian ini, meliputi heuristik, verifikasi sumber, interpretasi, dan historiografi. Sumber yang digunakan mencakup artikel ilmiah, tugas akhir, surat kabar, dan wawancara lisan dengan para pelaku sejarah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa konflik ini dipicu oleh perbedaan persepsi antara PLN dan warga mengenai dampak kesehatan, hak atas tanah, dan nilai ekonomi tanah yang dilalui SUTET. Warga menggunakan berbagai strategi perlawanan, termasuk mengadu, membangun aliansi, dan mengajukan gugatan hukum. Meskipun telah melakukan berbagai upaya, resistensi masyarakat tidak berhasil mengubah sikap PLN, yang berpegang pada dasar legalitas dan klaim akan kepentingan nasional.
Commemorating and Forgetting: Political Memory of the Battle of Surabaya throughout Old Order and New Order Regimes in Indonesia (1951 - 1988) Firdiyansyah, Mohammad Masrudin
Tarikhuna: Journal of History and History Education Vol 6, No 2 (2024)
Publisher : UIN Imam Bonjol Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15548/thje.v6i2.9957

Abstract

The gallantry of the people of Surabaya in resisting Allied forces in 10th November 1945 led the government to designate that date as Heroes’ Day. Various ceremonies are held and monuments are built to preserving the memory of the battle. However, the construction of this historical memory is not without its own interests. This research examines how historical memory of the Battle of Surabaya was constructed throughout the administration of Sukarno and Suharto, why the memory was erected and what aspect was deliberately forgotten. Employing historical methodology, this research shows Sukarno leveraged these historical narrtives to foster nationalism and enhance Indonenisa’s international standing. Under the regime of Suharto, the construction of historical memory was similarly used to promote his political agendas, spread anti-communism and legitimate military role. Both regimes sought to conceal the killings of civilians and the disparities between central administration and local Surabaya residents due to beliefs that it would undermine nationalism and heroic narrative.
Sketsmasa's Framing of Sukarno and Suharto in 1957-1968: A Study of Media Framing in the Authoritarian Era Firdiyansyah, Mohammad Masrudin; Rizky, Nabil Bahar
HISTORIA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah Vol 12, No 2 (2024): HISTORIA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH METRO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24127/hj.v12i2.8543

Abstract

This article aims to explain Sketsmasa magazine's framing of the Old and New Order rulers. The method used in this research is the historical method. The results show that Sketsmasa positively framed the Old and New Order governments because the government banned media that threatened their status quo. Sketsmasa's positive framing of the Old Order ruler, Sukarno, was by conveying Sukarno's outstanding leadership and correcting slanders against Sukarno that could defame him. During the New Order, Sketsmasa framed differently. Sketsmasa's framing was not only in the form of positive things about the then ruler, Soeharto, but also negative things about the previous ruler, Soekarno. Sketsmasa attacked Sukarno's personality and showed the crimes of the Old Order that had never been shown by Sketsmasa before. The aim was to create the impression in society that Soeharto was the savior of the abuses committed by Sukarno during the Old Order.
PERUBAHAN SOSIAL-EKONOMI MASYARAKAT BUMIPUTRA, CINA, DAN EROPA DI JAWA, ABAD KE-17 HINGGA AWAL ABAD KE-20 Firdiyansyah, Mohammad Masrudin
KRONIK : Journal of History Education and Historiography Vol 9 No 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/kjhi.v9i1.40120

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas perubahan struktur sosial-ekonomi masyarakat kolonial di Jawa dari abad ke-17 hingga awal abad ke-20, dengan menekankan dinamika relasi antara kelompok Bumiputra, Cina, dan Eropa dalam konteks kebijakan kolonial yang terus berubah. Kajian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh kurangnya penelitian yang secara komprehensif melihat bagaimana kebijakan kolonial yang menindas sekaligus menciptakan peluang mobilitas sosial bagi kelompok tertentu. Dengan menggunakan metode sejarah yang mencakup heuristik, verifikasi, interpretasi, dan historiografi, penelitian ini menelusuri kronologi perubahan sosial dalam lintas periode kolonial, mulai dari masa VOC, tanam paksa, liberalisasi ekonomi, hingga politik etis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa struktur sosial masyarakat kolonial bersifat fluktuatif dan ambivalen. Masing-masing kelompok mengalami fase dominasi dan kemunduran tergantung pada kedekatannya dengan kekuasaan kolonial. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa kolonialisme tidak hanya menghasilkan ketimpangan yang statis, melainkan juga membuka ruang terbatas bagi perubahan sosial. Studi ini berkontribusi pada historiografi kolonial Indonesia dengan menyoroti pentingnya pendekatan diakronis dan komparatif dalam memahami dinamika sosial masyarakat multietnis di bawah kekuasaan kolonial.
Co-Authors Rizky, Nabil Bahar