Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Investigation Obstacles (Obstruction of Justice in the Crime of the Planned Killing of Brigadir Nofriansyah Yosua Hutabarat in Legal Criminology Perspective) Erseta, Marcella; Pratama, Dicky Mulya; Tobing, Ega Yolanda Lumban; Alexander, Johan; Hasian, Clarissa; Azhar, Muhammad Dzaky Chairy
Lex Prospicit Vol. 2 No. 2: July 2024
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v2i2.6927

Abstract

Obstruction of justice carried out by the police group is an example that in practice anyone who violates the law must be punished. This research will examine this matter from a criminological point of view and discuss the sociological, psychological and biological impacts of the perpetrators of obstruction of justice as well as the role of society viewed through the crime side of the disappearance of evidence. This study uses a normative juridical research method. The results showed that this case was categorized as premeditated murder, which according to Sigmund Freud's psychoanalytic theory, psychologically, Ferdy Sambo committed the act of this crime of murder was due to a stimulus from Brigadier Yosua as the victim, while Ferdy Sambo's subordinates or subordinates committed this crime of murder because there were environmental factors (police agencies) that provided an opportunity to cause a crime. Criminology has a relationship with and is closely related to criminal law, especially when discussing Obstruction of Justice, so in this case it will discuss the existence of criminal etiology which seeks to explain that criminology is a tool for carrying out an effective arrangement and control of a legal sanction against criminal law which has the aim is to give fear to those who have the intention to commit a crime or a violation of criminal law. In this case, the police must be able to show that the police institution is at the forefront in handling all cases of criminal acts indiscriminately and prove this to the public.
Peran KPPU Dalam Mengawasi Merger dan Akuisisi yang Berpotensi Mengarah Pada Monopoli di Industri Keuangan Digital Bagas, Antonius; Syafiq, Dhiya Alif Pradana; Pratama, Dicky Mulya
UNES Law Review Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/r9ygrm42

Abstract

Industri keuangan digital di Indonesia berkembang sangat pesat seiring dengan meningkatnya adopsi teknologi finansial (fintech) oleh masyarakat. Pertumbuhan ini memicu terjadinya konsolidasi pasar melalui aksi merger dan akuisisi oleh para pelaku usaha untuk memperluas pangsa pasar, memperoleh efisiensi, dan memperkuat posisi kompetitif mereka. Namun, dinamika tersebut juga menimbulkan risiko terbentuknya struktur pasar yang monopolistik, yang pada gilirannya dapat menghambat inovasi, merugikan konsumen, dan mengurangi persaingan usaha yang sehat. Dalam konteks ini, peran Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) menjadi krusial dalam memastikan bahwa setiap transaksi merger dan akuisisi tidak menimbulkan dampak negatif terhadap persaingan usaha. KPPU memiliki mandat untuk menilai, menegur, bahkan membatalkan aksi korporasi yang dinilai berpotensi menciptakan praktik monopoli atau persaingan usaha tidak sehat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran KPPU dalam mengawasi merger dan akuisisi di industri keuangan digital, dengan fokus pada efektivitas mekanisme pengawasan, tantangan yuridis yang dihadapi, serta relevansi instrumen hukum persaingan usaha yang ada. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach) melalui studi literatur atas regulasi, pedoman KPPU, serta putusan terkait. Hasil penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan kontribusi terhadap pengembangan kebijakan persaingan usaha yang adaptif terhadap dinamika industri keuangan digital, serta menjadi dasar bagi penguatan peran KPPU dalam mencegah konsentrasi pasar yang merugikan persaingan.