<![CDATA[This research aims to determine the influence of training and work motivation on the performance of employees at the Archives and Library Office of Depok City. The research method used is a quantitative approach. The type of data utilized is primary data obtained through the distribution of questionnaires. Data collection was conducted at the Archives and Library Office of Depok City with a sample of 51 respondents. Data analysis includes descriptive tests, validity tests, reliability tests, and classical assumption tests, including normality tests, multicollinearity tests, heteroscedasticity tests, and autocorrelation tests. Multiple linear regression analysis, coefficient of determination analysis, and hypothesis tests consisting of partial tests (t-tests) and simultaneous tests (f-tests) were also conducted. The data was processed using SPSS 26 software, with a confidence level of 5%.Based on the analysis results, the regression equation obtained is Y = 20.623 + 0.698X1. From the analysis, it is found that the value of t-count > t-table (5.118 > 2.01063), which is supported by a significance value of 0.000 < 0.05. Therefore, H01 is accepted, and H1 is rejected, indicating that there is no partial influence of training on employee performance. Based on further analysis, the regression equation obtained is Y = 20.417 + 0.510X2. It is found that the value of t-count > t-table (5.219 > 2.01063), which is supported by a significance value of 0.000 < 0.05. Thus, H02 is rejected, and H2 is accepted, showing that there is a positive and significant partial influence of work motivation on employee performance.The research results indicate that both training and work motivation positively influence employee performance. The regression equation obtained is Y = 17.317 + 0.298X1 + 0.356X2 + e. From the SPSS test results, the F-count value is 15.503, while the F-table value for the variables of training (X1), work motivation (X2), and employee performance (Y) with a 5% error rate is 3.19. The simultaneous test results show that F-count > F-table (15.503 > 3.19). Thus, Ho3 is rejected, and Ha3 is accepted, indicating that training and work motivation have a simultaneous influence on employee performance.]]>
