Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI)
Buranaaudsawakul, Techatat
Unknown Affiliation
Computer Science & IT Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Optimal turning of a 2-DOF proportional-integral-derivative controller based on a chess algorithm for load frequency control Buranaaudsawakul, Techatat; Ardhan, Kittipong; Audomsi, Sitthisak; Sa-ngiamvibool, Worawat; Dulyala, Rattapon
International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) Vol 15, No 1: February 2025
Publisher : Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.11591/ijece.v15i1.pp146-155

Abstract

Load frequency control is necessary for power system management. The power system must maintain a frequency range to ensure power supply stability. System faults and demand fluctuations may cause frequencies to change quickly. System stability and integrity suffer. We are optimizing the two-degree-of-freedom (2-DOF) proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controllers chess algorithm. This article addresses electrical load frequency regulation. We employ classical control theory and current adjustment. It aims for electrical system efficiency and dependability. It checks for errors using integral absolute error (IAE), integral squared error (ISE), integral of time multiply absolute error (ITAE), and integral time squared error (ITSE). Particle swarm algorithm (PSO) compares performance. The IAE of 0.03364, nearly identical to it, shows that chess trumps other algorithms in many scenarios. The chess algorithm's ISE was 0.00035, like PSO's 0.03363. The ISE was 0.00036, indicating PSO's error-reduction capabilities. For the chess algorithm, PSO is 0.07929, and ITAE is 0.07647. This indicates the PSO responds faster to system breakdowns and load changes. Finally, the chess algorithm's ITSE is 0.00072, below the PSO 0.00076. The chess algorithm is better at managing long-term load frequency.
Development of a 2 degree of freedom-proportional integral derivative controller using the hippopotamus algorithm Dulyala, Rattapon; Sa-ngiamvibool, Worawat; Audomsi, Sitthisak; Ardhah, Kittipong; Buranaaudsawakul, Techatat
IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI) Vol 14, No 1: February 2025
Publisher : Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.11591/ijai.v14.i1.pp780-787

Abstract

This research project investigates the regulation of autonomous power generation in two interconnected regions using two hydroelectric power plants. It specifically addresses the challenges posed by significant electrical system issues. The hippopotamus optimization algorithm (HOA) has demonstrated enhanced gain value in research and designs of 2 degree of freedom (2DOF)-proportional integral derivative (PID) controllers. The objective is to provide efficient and uninterrupted functioning of the electrical network in both areas. Contemporary technology and methods enable the electrical system to efficiently and accurately fulfill user requirements, resolving any problems related to system balance and stability. This experiment evaluates the efficacy of several algorithms in accurately selecting optimal values. We evaluate performance using the integral of absolute error (IAE) and integral of time-weighted absolute error (ITAE) functions. This experiment evaluates and contrasts different algorithms. Summarizing the analysis using verifiable evidence. Optimization when evaluated using the ITAE measurement, the HOA earned the lowest result of 0.08744 for ITAE. Empirical research has demonstrated that this strategy is the most effective in reducing the ITAE. The sine-cosine algorithm (SCA) and whale optimization algorithm (WOA) have similar ITAE values, with SCA having an error of 0.08967 and WOA having an error of 0.08967. The numerical number is 0.08970.
Co-Authors Ardhah, Kittipong Ardhan, Kittipong Audomsi, Sitthisak Dulyala, Rattapon Sa-ngiamvibool, Worawat