Kartini, Kartini
Universitas Riau

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The requirements of junior high school/MTs mathematics teachers in Riau for integrated literacy and numeracy teaching modules aimed at enhancing students' critical mathematical thinking skills Suanto, Elfis; Kartini, Kartini; Sonia, Anisa
AXIOM : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Matematika Vol 13, No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30821/axiom.v13i2.21857

Abstract

The role of teachers as implementers is crucial in the execution of the Independent Curriculum. Teaching modules can serve as guidelines for teachers to ensure effective and efficient learning. Strengthening literacy and numeracy is one of the demands of the Independent Curriculum, aiming to develop students with critical mathematical thinking skills to compete globally. However, field observations indicate that teachers still require guidance in compiling teaching modules that align with the Independent Curriculum and meet their students' needs. This descriptive study analyzes teachers' needs for integrated literacy and numeracy teaching modules to enhance students' critical thinking skills. Data were collected through a non-test questionnaire distributed via Google Forms to junior high school/MTs mathematics teachers in Riau, with 11 participants. The study's results indicated that 72.7% of teachers expressed a significant need for integrated literacy and numeracy teaching modules to improve students' critical mathematical thinking abilities. Additionally, the analysis revealed that some teachers had developed their own teaching modules, but these lacked the integration of literacy and numeracy, and did not facilitate students' critical mathematical thinking skills. This highlights the necessity for the development of integrated literacy and numeracy teaching modules to enhance students' critical mathematical thinking skills.
ANALISIS KESALAHAN SISWA MENURUT KASTOLAN DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL TIPE AKM NUMERASI PADA DOMAIN GEOMETRI Sonia, Anisa; Suanto, Elfis; Kartini, Kartini; Maimunah, Maimunah
AXIOM : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Matematika Vol 12, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30821/axiom.v12i1.15549

Abstract

Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum (AKM) merupakan penilaian kemampuan minimum yang dilakukan kepada peserta didik sebagai pengganti Ujian Nasional (UN). Kemampuan minimum yang dimaksud adalah kemampuan paling dasar yang harus dimiliki oleh peserta didik meliputi literasi membaca dan numerasi. Fakta di lapangan menunjukkan bahwa lebih dari 50% peserta didik tidak mencapai batas kompetensi minimum untuk kemampuan numerasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui jenis-jenis kesalahan yang dilakukan oleh peserta didik dalam menyelesaikan soal tipe AKM numerasi khususnya domain geometri berdasarkan teori Kastolan, yaitu: (1) kesalahan konseptual, (2) kesalahan prosedural, dan (3) kesalahan teknis. Penelitian yang telah dilakukan merupakan penelitian deskriptif kualitatif dengan instrumen penelitian berupa tiga butir soal uraian geometri tipe AKM pada 30 peserta didik kelas VIII.8 SMPN 9 Pekanbaru. Hasil yang diperoleh berdasarkan hasil lembar jawaban peserta didik, diantaranya: (1) kesalahan konseptual sebesar 44,6% kategori berat, (2) kesalahan prosedural sebesar 38,5% kategori cukup berat, dan (3) kesalahan teknis sebesar 16,9% kategori ringan. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa kesalahan yang paling banyak dilakukan adalah kesalahan konseptual. Hasil dari penelitian ini memberikan gambaran mengenai berbagai kesalahan yang dilakukan peserta didik dalam menyelesaikan soal tipe AKM numerasi khususnya domain geometri, sehingga dapat menentukan tindak lanjut agar kemampuan numerasi peserta didik menjadi lebih baik. AbstractMinimum Competency Assessment (AKM) is a minimum ability assessment conducted on students as a substitute for the National Examination (UN). The minimum ability is the most basic ability that must be possessed by students, including reading literacy and numeracy. The data indicate that more than 50% of students do not reach the minimum competency limit for numeracy skills. This study aims to determine the types of errors made by students in solving AKM numeration-type questions, especially the geometry domain based on Kastolan theory, namely: (1) conceptual errors, (2) procedural errors, and (3) technical errors. This study follows a qualitative descriptive study with research instruments in the form of three items of AKM-type geometry description questions on 30 eighth-grade students of SMPN 9 Pekanbaru. The results obtained are based on the results of student answer sheets, including (1) conceptual errors of 44.6% in the severe category, (2) procedural errors of 38.5% in the moderately severe category, and (3) technical errors in the 16.9% light category. It can be concluded that the most common mistakes are conceptual errors. The results of this study provide an overview of the various mistakes made by students in solving AKM numeration-type questions, especially in the geometry domain so that they can determine follow-up actions so that students' numeracy abilities become better.