Sitompul, Naomi Audri Klarisa
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Recht Studiosum Law Review

The Urgency of Implementing Step-In Rights Clauses in Project Financing Contracts in Indonesia Sitompul, Naomi Audri Klarisa; Jevvon Suherman; Hidayat Dita Nur Faizal; Hamit Tantio Lumban Gaol; Adelina Mariani Sihombing
Recht Studiosum Law Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): Volume 3 Nomor 2 (November - 2024)
Publisher : Talenta Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32734/rslr.v3i2.18577

Abstract

The increasing infrastructure development in Indonesia today is directly proportional to the growing need for funding to support such projects. The funding model commonly used in infrastructure development is project finance, where risk management and cost allocation are shared among the project participants. As infrastructure projects become more complex and long-term, they often face various issues such as cash flow problems and losses incurred in the event of default. These issues can actually be addressed by implementing the Step-In Rights Clause, which grants the employer the right to intervene in the work of the contractor. However, the regulation of the step-in rights clause has not yet been explicitly governed by Indonesian legislation. This paper aims to explain the urgency of applying the step-in rights clause in construction contracts. The article employs a normative legal research method with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. In practice, the application of the step-in rights clause offers many advantages and has been implemented in several countries, including Australia.   Meningkatnya pembangunan infrastruktur di Indonesia saat ini berbanding lurus dengan meningkatnya kebutuhan pendanaan untuk mendukung proyek-proyek tersebut. Model pendanaan yang umum digunakan dalam pembangunan infrastruktur adalah project finance, di mana pengelolaan risiko dan alokasi biaya dibagi di antara para peserta proyek. Seiring dengan semakin kompleksnya proyek infrastruktur dan berjangka panjang, proyek-proyek tersebut kerap kali menghadapi berbagai permasalahan seperti masalah arus kas dan kerugian yang timbul jika terjadi wanprestasi. Permasalahan tersebut sebenarnya dapat diatasi dengan penerapan Step-In Rights Clause yang memberikan hak kepada pemberi kerja untuk melakukan intervensi terhadap pekerjaan kontraktor. Akan tetapi, pengaturan mengenai step-in rights clause belum diatur secara tegas dalam peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan urgensi penerapan step-in rights clause dalam kontrak konstruksi. Artikel ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Dalam praktiknya, penerapan step-in rights clause memiliki banyak keuntungan dan telah diterapkan di beberapa negara, termasuk Australia.Kata kunci: Proyek infrastruktur, Hak campur tangan, Pembiayaan proyek
Legal Analysis of the Issuance of SHGB Over Maritime Areas in Tangerang from the Perspective of Indonesian Agrarian Law Sitompul, Naomi Audri Klarisa; Siboro, Christian Imanuel
Recht Studiosum Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Volume 4 Nomor 1 (Mei - 2025)
Publisher : Talenta Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32734/rslr.v4i1.20262

Abstract

The issuance of 263 Building Use Rights Certificates (SHGB) on the sea barrier along the northern coast of Tangerang, Banten, spanning more than 30 km, has sparked controversy among the public. The issuance of these SHGBs has been confirmed by the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency (ATR/BPN), Nusron Wahid. Positivistically, the presence of the SHGB is actually contrary to a number of regulations in Indonesia, including Law No. 5 of 1960 concerning Agrarian Principles, Law No. 27 of 2007 jo. Law No. 1 of 2014, Government Regulation No. 18 of 2021, Constitutional Court Decision No. 3/PUU-VIII/2010, as well as the principles in Article 33 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution. Beyond the issue of legality, from a sociological and empirical standpoint, the presence of SHGBs on the sea barrier in Tangerang also has negative ecological and economic impacts. These SHGBs disrupt the marine ecosystem and hamper the livelihoods of local fishermen, as they obstruct access to fishing areas. Therefore, this paper aims to further analyze the legal basis for granting Building Use Rights (HGB) within Indonesia’s agrarian system, examine the legality of granting HGB on the sea barrier in Tangerang, and assess the socioeconomic and ecological impacts of these SHGBs through a case study approach focusing on Tangerang.