Medina Rivas Plata, Anthony Rolando
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Commercial protectionism as a response to the globalization crisis in the West: Trump and Brexit Medina Rivas Plata, Anthony Rolando
Ius Humani. Jornal do direito v. 13 n. 1 (2024): Ius Humani. Revista de Derecho
Publisher : Universidad Hemisferios

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31207/ih.v13i1.345

Abstract

In recent years, we have witnessed a significant turn towards commercial protectionism as a response to what some perceive as clear discontent provoked by the current process of globalization. Our work will focus on two of the most emblematic events symbolizing this trend: the presidency of Donald J. Trump (2017-2021) in the United States and the Brexit referendum in the United Kingdom. Trump marked a turning point in U.S. trade policy, advocating an "America First" approach that included imposing tariffs and renegotiating international trade agreements. On the other hand, the 2016 Brexit referendum and the subsequent UK's departure from the European Union in 2020 represented a paradigmatic case of regional protectionism. Therefore, we will explore how Brexit affected trade relations between the UK and the EU, as well as its position on the international stage. Along these lines, we will discuss the broader implications of these two dynamics in the context of the globalization crisis: Do these movements pose a sustainable challenge to the existing global economic order, or are they temporary responses to specific issues? What lessons can be drawn from these experiences for the future management of trade conflicts?
The Right to be Forgotten in the Digital Age: A Comparative Analysis Between Spain and Peru Arbildo Pérez, Natalia Ivett; Medina Rivas Plata, Anthony Rolando
Ius Humani. Jornal do direito Vol. 15 N.º 2 (2026): Ius Humani. Revista de Derecho
Publisher : Universidad Hemisferios

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31207/ih.v15i2.466

Abstract

The right to be forgotten has become one of the most relevant legal responses to the indefinite retention of personal information online. This article analyzes its content, limits, and conditions for its exercise from a comparative perspective between Spain and Peru. Methodologically, it combines a doctrinal review of open-access academic literature with a normative and jurisprudential analysis. The study argues that the right to be forgotten is not equivalent to erasing history or a general power of censorship, but rather a right to protect personal data aimed, above all, at limiting the disproportionate and targeted search of inaccurate, decontextualized, irrelevant, or excessive information. In Spain, the model has received explicit recognition and relatively stable criteria based on the GDPR, Organic Law 3/2018, and the Costeja case law. In Peru, although Law 29733 does not explicitly address it, the current framework has evolved through administrative regulations, constitutional jurisprudence, and the regulations approved by Supreme Decree 016-2024-JUS, which incorporates de-indexation. It is concluded that the Peruvian system still requires more precise legislative formulation and a more consistent balancing test against freedom of expression.