Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

ANALISIS UPAYA HUKUM BANDING DALAM MENJAMIN KEADILAN TERHADAP PROSES PERADILAN PIDANA DI INDONESIA Dwianisa, Shindy
Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 7 No. 9 (2024): Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.3783/causa.v7i9.7063

Abstract

This study aims to analyze appellate legal remedies in the criminal justice system in Indonesia as an instrument to ensure justice. Appeal legal remedies allow the defendant or victim to apply for a reexamination of the decision of the court of first instance if there is dissatisfaction with the decision. This study examines the legal basis, implementation procedures, and implications of appeals against the rights of defendants, victims, and the community. In addition, this study evaluates the extent to which the appeal mechanism can ensure the principle of balanced justice in the criminal justice process. The results show that appellate legal remedies, although aimed at correcting judicial errors, often face challenges in the form of long process times and uncertainty of results. Therefore, an update is needed in the procedure for the implementation of appeals to increase its effectiveness in ensuring justice for all parties involved. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis upaya hukum banding dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia sebagai instrumen untuk menjamin keadilan. Upaya hukum banding memungkinkan terdakwa atau korban untuk mengajukan permohonan pemeriksaan ulang atas putusan pengadilan tingkat pertama jika terdapat ketidakpuasan terhadap putusan tersebut. Penelitian ini mengkaji landasan hukum, prosedur pelaksanaan, serta implikasi dari upaya banding terhadap hak-hak terdakwa, korban, dan masyarakat. Selain itu, penelitian ini mengevaluasi sejauh mana mekanisme banding dapat menjamin prinsip keadilan yang berimbang dalam proses peradilan pidana. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa upaya hukum banding, meskipun bertujuan memperbaiki kesalahan yudisial, seringkali menghadapi tantangan berupa lamanya waktu proses dan ketidakpastian hasil. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan pembaruan dalam prosedur pelaksanaan banding untuk meningkatkan efektivitasnya dalam menjamin keadilan bagi semua pihak yang terlibat.
Analisis Yuridis Pengaruh Protokol Kyoto Terhadap Upaya Penanggulangan Pemanasan Global (Global Warming) Anggraini, Yuli; Dwianisa, Shindy; Septaria, Ema; Adepio, M. Ilham
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Januari-Juni
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/whc1b554

Abstract

This study examines the juridical analysis of the influence of the Kyoto Protocol on efforts to tackle global warming. Global warming is defined as an increase in the average temperature of the earth’s surface due to rising greenhouse gas emissions caused by human activities such as fossil fuel combustion, deforestation, and agricultural activities. The Kyoto Protocol, as an international legal instrument under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), aims to stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations through structured and measurable regulatory mechanisms. It establishes quantitative emission reduction targets, particularly for developed countries, and introduces flexible mechanisms such as Emission Trading, Joint Implementation, and Clean Development Mechanism. However, its effectiveness remains limited due to unequal obligations between developed and developing countries, lack of binding enforcement mechanisms, and the absence of major emitting countries in its implementation. Therefore, although the Kyoto Protocol represents an important milestone in international environmental law, its impact on reducing global warming is still considered less effective.
Peran Perwakilan Diplomatik Indonesia dalam Melindungi Kepentingan Nasional pada Situasi Eskalasi Geopolitik: Studi Kasus Hubungan Indonesia–Iran Dwianisa, Shindy; Putri, Syafariah Nata; Anggraini, Yuli; Qurratun Nisa, Laura Shafa
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Januari-Juni
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/kvvd0824

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role and effectiveness of Indonesian diplomatic representatives in Iran in protecting national interests in situations of geopolitical escalation, particularly regarding access to energy routes through the Strait of Hormuz. The method used is normative legal research with a legislative and conceptual approach, and using primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study indicate that Indonesian diplomatic representatives carry out the functions of representation, negotiation, protection, and strategic reporting in accordance with the 1961 Vienna Convention. However, their effectiveness faces various obstacles such as limited bargaining power, geopolitical complexity, policy uncertainty, limited diplomatic instruments, and national energy dependence. Thus, diplomatic relations do not automatically guarantee the protection of national interests, because they are greatly influenced by the dynamics of each country's interests in the global geopolitical context.