Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ANALISIS PERENCANAAN PENANGANAN ABRASI MENGGUNAKAN DINDING PENAHAN TANAH KANTILEVER DAN PONDASI BOREPILE Alhafidz, Muhammad; Rosyad, Farlin
Rang Teknik Journal Vol 8, No 1 (2025): Vol. 8 No. 1 Januari 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Teknik Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31869/rtj.v8i1.5790

Abstract

Coastal abrasion, soil pressure and rainfall are factors that greatly affect slope stability in the coastal area ofNorth Bengkulu. This can cause landslides on the road body if no protection is provided on the slope. In this study, an analysis was carried out on the retaining wall plan starting from shear stability, rolling stability, soil bearing capacity and continued with the analysis of the borepile foundation permit using manual calculations, after which the analysis was continued using Plaxis 8.2 to determine the Global Safety Factor. The results of the study showed that the existing slope had a safety factor of 1.051 (Not safe) so that to meet the geotechnical requirements of SNI 8460: 2017, the slope reinforcement at this research location used a safety device, namely a retaining wall combined with a borepile foundation. The next stage is the analysis for the Global Safety Factor using Plaxis 8.2 modeling which shows that the reinforcement of the retaining wall combined with the borepile foundation has a safety factor of 2.387 (Safe). The retaining wall has a height of 7.5 meters and an additional 6 meters for selected embankments which are equipped with drainage and vegetation, then the drilled well has a depth of 6 meters and a diameter of 60cm.Keywords: Abrasion, Borepile Foundations, Plaxis 8.2, Retaining Wall, Safety Factor
Konsep Demokrasi (Syura): Studi Komparatif Menurut Tafsir Al Mishbah dan Tafsir Ibnu Katsir AlHafidz, Muhammad; Ainur Rha’in
Reslaj: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025): RESLAJ: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal
Publisher : Intitut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/reslaj.v7i3.5749

Abstract

This research discusses a comparison of the concept of democracy in Islam, especially the principle of shura, according to Quraish Shihab and Ibnu Katsir. The two mufassir have different views regarding shura as a democratic principle. Quraish Shihab views shura (deliberation) as a principle that is in line with modern democratic values, such as freedom, equality and justice, using a contextual approach to apply deliberation in the socio-political life of Muslims. On the other hand, Ibn Kathir emphasized the importance of shura, but still based on God's law. He does not link shura directly to modern democracy, but instead views shura as worship and good deeds. This research uses thematic and comparative exegetical methods to examine various verses of the Koran related to deliberation. with the results showing that although the two mufassir have different points of view, they agree that deliberation is an important basic principle in social and state life in Islam. It is hoped that the results of this research will enrich the study of the relationship between shura and democracy and provide an understanding of the relevance of deliberation in contemporary societal life.