Sheila Noor Baity
Faculty Of Law, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Pendaftaran Merek Kolektif Sentra Gudeg Wijilan Di Kota Yogyakarta Ditinjau Dari Undang–Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek Dan Indikasi Geografis Sherina Puspita Salsa Bela; Shakira Wandari Putri; Sheila Noor Baity; Budi Agus Riswandi
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 4 JULI 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Yogyakarta City is an area known as a tourist destination for tourists who have culinary tourism attractions, one of which is gudeg. Gudeg as an icon as well as a typical culinary of Yogyakarta City is also preserved by the community and supported by the Government with the establishment of gudeg industry centers, including the Wijilan Gudeg Center as a popular gudeg culinary tourism center. Although known as the Wijilan Gudeg Center, the fact is that most gudeg traders in the area have not registered their brands with the Ministry of Law and Human Rights through the Directorate General of Intellectual Property Rights due to the lack of knowledge of gudeg traders regarding the importance of legal protection for gudeg brands. The method used in this study is the empirical juridical method through a statute approach which is then analyzed using descriptive analysis. The results of the study indicate that gudeg traders in the Wijilan Gudeg Center area have the potential to register brands collectively which are used as an alternative to legal protection for brands for gudeg traders according to Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Brands and Geographical Indications.
Perlindungan Nasabah Terhadap Klausula Eksonerasi Dalam Akad Pembiayaan Murabahah Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif Maulana, Anaia Gaizka; Priyatama, Alwan Brilliant; Nugroho, Krisna Akbar; Triyanta, Agus; Baity, Sheila Noor
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 4 JULI 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

An exoneration clause in a murabaha financing agreement that exempts Islamic financing institutions from responsibility for losses arising from a transaction. To ensure clarity and legal protection, the agreement in murabaha financing transactions is used as a formal tool. However, some business actors have misused this agreement by including a risk transfer clause to the customer to obtain greater profits. This paper aims to review and analyze the validity and legal protection of the inclusion of such clauses in murabaha financing agreements. The research is conducted normatively with the approach of legislation, positive law theory, Al-Quran, Hadith and Fiqh. The results of the analysis show that according to positive law, including Islamic Law and Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection, the clause transferring the responsibility of the Business Actor to the Customer in the murabaha financing agreement is declared null and void. The responsibility for the risk is legally borne by The Business Actor. As a result, the murabahah financing agreement is considered invalid from the start and cannot be used to transfer ownership rights. The law governing this agreement is based on the principle of Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali, where Islamic Law has more specific power than the General Provisions of Civil Law.
Ensuring Food Security in Indonesia: The Urgent Need for Food Loss and Waste Regulation Baity, Sheila Noor; Afinnas, Muhamad Agil Aufa
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 32 No. 2: MEI 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol32.iss2.art6

Abstract

The phenomenon of Food Loss and Waste (FLW) is a problem with serious impacts on environmental, economic, and social aspects. This research aims to analyze the normative issues surrounding FLW in Indonesia in accordance with the mandate of Article 27 and 28H(1) of the 1945 Constitution, while also offering prescriptions on how Indonesian law should address the FLW issue. This research is a normative legal research, using a conceptual and comparative approach. The comparative approach involves analyzing legal systems in three jurisdictions: Europe, America, and Asia. Furthermore, the concept of smart regulation is used as a perspective to prescribe effective FLW regulations in Indonesia. The findings of this research show that Indonesia has demonstrated awareness of FLW through the National Food waste Agency (NFA), the legal draft on FLW and the revision of Food law in progress. However, the absence of specific regulations on FLW proves to be counterproductive to the current government priorities. Secondly, to address the FLW issue, a combination of Command and Control (CaC) instruments, economic instruments, and educational and informational strategies is highly recommended. Integrating these three instruments is expected to encourage all stakeholders—including the government, business actors, and the community—to contribute to solving the FLW problem. This recommendation is also supported by an analysis of FLW regulations in Europe, America, and Asia, which reveals that a combination of Command and Control (CaC) mechanisms, economic instruments, and education can effectively reduce FLW in these regions.
HARMONISASI DIRECT LICENSING DAN COLLECTIVE LICENSING ATAS PERFORMING RIGHTS DI INDONESIA Baity, Sheila Noor; Rakhmawati, Catur Septiana
JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 8, No.2, 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/jipro.vol8.iss2.art5

Abstract

This study aims to address two legal issues: First, the weaknesses in the Copyright Law and its implementing regulations regarding the application of direct licensing—particularly for performing rights—with a focus on the subjects, licensing system, and the role of Collective Management Organizations (LMK) and the National Collective Management Organization (LMKN). Second, efforts to harmonize the regulation of direct and collective licensing in Indonesia by comparing the legal frameworks for direct licensing in the United States and Australia. This is a normative legal study that relies on secondary data and employs qualitative analysis. The findings reveal that the regulatory weaknesses in Indonesia concerning direct licensing include the unclear identification of royalty recipients, the absence of a recognized licensing system, and the provisions governing LMKN and LMK under the Government Regulation on Royalties (PP Royalti), which effectively nullify the right to direct licensing as stipulated in the Copyright Law. This study proposes several recommendations for harmonizing the regulation of direct and collective licensing in Indonesia: First, clarifying the legal subjects entitled to royalties in the Copyright Law by clearly defining the terms “any person” and “user.” Second, harmonizing relevant regulations, particularly Government Regulation No. 56 of 2021. Third, improving the role of LMKN either as a regulator and mediator or by delegating its implementation to the Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DJKI).
Menakar Daya Lindung Hukum Perikatan Terhadap Hak Masyarakat Adat: Kajian Normatif Dan Komparatif Vina Ayunda Pramesti; Sheila Noor Baity; Sinta Prasetya Dewi
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 2 MARET 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Dalam satu dekade terakhir, Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara (AMAN) mencatat sedikitnya 687 konflik agraria di wilayah adat seluas 11,07 juta hektar, yang mengakibatkan lebih dari 925 warga masyarakat adat dikriminalisasi dan mendapat kekerasan. Dalam berbagai diskursus mengenai masyarakat adat, pemenuhan dan perlindungan hak-hak masyarakat adat masih menjadi isu yang kompleks, terutama mengenai pengakuan dan implementasinya oleh negara. Meskipun Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 (UUD 45) mengakui dan menghormati masyarakat hukum adat, tetapi hal ini hanya berlaku bersyarat sepanjang “kenyataannya masih ada dan tidak bertentangan dengan prinsip NKRI”. Kegagalan hukum publik dalam menjamin perlindungan dan pemenuhan hak-hak masyarakat adat menegaskan urgensi penelitian ini untuk menilai sejauh mana hukum perikatan dapat berperan sebagai instrumen perlindungan dan penjaminan hak masyarakat adat dalam hubungan kontraktual antara masyarakat adat, negara, dan pelaku usaha. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan komparatif untuk menelaah sejauh mana hukum perikatan dapat melindungi hak masyarakat adat. Analisis dilakukan terhadap bahan hukum primer (KUHPerdata, UUD 1945, UU sektoral terkait) dan sekunder (literatur akademik, putusan pengadilan, perjanjian internasional, serta kebijakan di Kanada, Australia, dan Filipina menggunakan teknik deskriptif-analitis.