Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

A Review of International Criminal Law on Human Rights Violations to The Rohingya Ethnicity Tisna Amidjaja, Ryigen; Dasuki; Putra Zenno Januarsyah, Mas
Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV) Vol 6 No 3 (2024): The Effectiveness of Law Enforcement and Prevention in Modern Society
Publisher : Department of Law, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/aldev.v6i3.49895

Abstract

The Rohingya ethnic minority faces discrimination as a result of the policies and actions of the Myanmar government. This discussion will centre on the delineation of violations and the manner in which international law evaluates human rights transgressions perpetrated against the Rohingya ethnic group in Myanmar. The research methodology employed in this study is a normative juridical approach, specifically utilising legal ideas and norms that are applicable in broader society. The legal materials utilised encompass elementary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The grave human rights atrocities that took place in Myanmar can be categorised as international crimes, specifically genocide and crimes against humanity. These violations satisfy the significant standards of mass murder, widespread prejudice against religious minorities, and intentional targeting of specific ethnicities and communities. The crimes mentioned are delineated in articles 6 and 7 of the Rome Statute, which are under the purview of the International Criminal Court (ICC).
Penerapan Asas Aut Dedere Aut Punere Bagi Warga Negara Indonesia Pelaku Pembunuhan Di Arab Saudi Dikaitkan Dengan Konvensi Wina 1963 Tentang Hubungan Konsuler Putra Zenno Januarsyah, Mas; Saepulloh, Aep
YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Cv. Kalimasada Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59966/yudhistira.v3i3.1991

Abstract

Law enforcement against Indonesian citizens (WNI) who commit serious crimes abroad, particularly murder in Saudi Arabia, poses challenges in implementing the principle of aut dedere aut punire and protection under the 1963 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. This study aims to analyze the discrepancy between judicial practices in Saudi Arabia and the consular protection obligations of the sending state (Indonesia). Using normative juridical methods and a case-based approach, this study finds that Saudi Arabia prioritizes territorial jurisdiction and sharia law in prosecuting perpetrators, without considering extradition. Meanwhile, the implementation of consular protection is often suboptimal due to delays in information and diplomatic obstacles. This study recommends strengthening legal diplomacy and increasing bilateral cooperation for more effective protection of Indonesian citizens involved in serious legal cases abroad.