Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Bangsa
Putri, Keysha Adilla
Unknown Affiliation
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal

 1 
Penerapan Metode Pembelajaran STAD (Student Teams Achivement Division) Berbantuan Aplikasi Filmora untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Sejarah Kelas XI di SMAN 1 Cigugur Putri, Keysha Adilla; Lutfi, Ahmad Fajri
Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal Vol. 6 No. 5 (2025): Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal
Publisher : Lembaga Intelektual Muda (LIM) Maluku

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54373/imeij.v6i5.4018

Abstract

This study aims to increase student learning motivation through the application of the STAD (Student Teams Achivement Division) method using the filmora application as a support. This study uses a quantitative method with a Quasi Experimental approach and a Pretest-Posttest Control Design design implemented in SMA Negeri 1 Cigugur with 308 students. The sample of this research was class XI-1 as the experimental class and class XI-3 as the control class. Data were collected using pretest and posttest questionnaires on learning motivation, observation and documentation. Data were analyzed descriptively quantitatively. The results of the study revealed a significant difference in learning motivation between the conventional method and the STAD method assisted by the filmora application, stated through hypothesis testing with a t-test. The average posttest value of the control class was 74,41, while the experimental class was 80,23 with a difference of 5,82. It is known that the calculated t value of 6,380 is greater than the t table of 1,996 (6,380 > 1,996), so H1 is accepted and H0 is rejected.
Co-Authors anisa damayanti Damayanti, Alfina Firjatullah, Rizal Lutfi, Ahmad Fajri