Aline Gratika
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Artificial Intelligence pada Google Maps berdasarkan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual: Artificial Intelligence On Google Maps Based On Intellectual Property Rights Fauzan Akmal; Aline Gratika
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 4 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i4.21339

Abstract

Google Maps is an example of a computer program based on Artificial Intelligence. Howerver, until now, there are no explicit regulations, especially in Intellectual Property Law in Indonesia, that govern it. The issue in this research is How are the intellectual property rights of Artificial Intelligence on Google Maps?. Therefore, this research will analyze Artificial Intelligence on Google Maps based on Intellectual Property Rights. This research uses normative research methods that utilize secondary data and also primary data only as supporting data, the nature of this research is descriptive and conclusions are drawn using deductive methods. The results of this research are Artificial Intelligence is the result of human thought processes that become assets and generate rights that need to be protected, and based on intellectual property rights, Artificial Intelligence can be said to be a computer program where there are only 2 legal aspects regulating it, namely copyright and patents, the scope of which depends on the final form of the Artificial Intelligence itself. Based on the analysis of intellectual property rights on Google Maps as Artificial Intelligence, from its operation,it can be said to fall within the scope of patents.
BIAYA TAHUNAN PATEN CIVITAS AKADEMIKA UNIVERSITAS TRISAKTI YANG TIDAK TERKOMERSIALISASI: Annual Fee For Non-Commercial Patents Of Trisakti University Academicians Marsha Prastari; Aline Gratika
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i2.23023

Abstract

When a patent application has been granted and the patent has been registered in the general register of patents, the patent begins to receive protection. Thus, the owner or holder of the patent has the right to exercise the patent rights himself. In addition to these rights, as a result of patent protection, the patent owner/holder has several obligations, one of which is to pay the annual patent fee, to any patent owner/holder including universities, is Trisakti. The indentification problem in this research is about the payment of annual fees for patents that are not commercialized, in this case patents at Trisakti. The result and the conclusion shows that based on Article 21 of Law No.13 Year 2016 of Patent, there is no exception in the payment of annual fee. The reason for not commercializing a patent cannot be the reason for not paying the annual fee. Therefore, Trisakti as the holder of patent rights from its academic community is still obliged to pay annual fees. No Trisakti patent has been successfully commercialized, but Trisakti still pays the annual fee because if the annual fee is not paid, the consequence is that the patent rights will be revoked.