Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Mendapo: Journal of Administrative Law Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Kartika Sari, Elsi
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
MASALAH DALAM SISTEM PRE PROJECT SELLING APARTEMEN GRAND CUT MEUTIA Nancy Glhoria Situmorang; Kartika Sari, Elsi; Situmorang, Nancy Glhoria
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v5i1.15252

Abstract

The Pre Project Selling system is a method of selling apartments that is used before the building process is complete. The developer, the buyer, and the guarantor agency all profit from this system since it allows marketing to take place even before construction is started. The PPJB. 401/Pdt.G/2020/Pn.Bks, which claims that the developer has breached promises, is accurate. This is known as the Pre-Project Selling System, but in reality it leads to many violations. It is normative juridical research-which is based on secondary data, analytical descriptive with inductive conclusions-was conducted to address these issues. The findings of the investigation, the analysis, and the judgment, all in one ruling decision number 401/Pdt.G/2020/Pn.Bks by the judge has imposed a sanction in which the company Selaras Mitra Sejati states that the developer has correctly broken a promise as described in the order letter in Article 8 Paragraph G there that after which the purchase order was merged with the PPJB. the judge's decision stating that the developer broke promises, such as the UURS regarding sanctions in Article 110, the sanctions that must be fulfilled in this decision are appropriate because they did not submit the PPJB for Grand Cut Meutia Apartments.
The Overlooking of Substantive Justice: A Progressive Legal Examination of the PT Timah Tbk Corruption Ruling: Keadilan Substantif yang Terabaikan: Telaah Hukum Progresif atas Putusan Kasus Korupsi PT Timah Tbk Intan Amara Dewi, Adinda; Gabriella Bridget Tarandung, Helena; Tira Varany, Yacinta; Kartika Sari, Elsi
Mendapo: Journal of Administrative Law Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): Oktober 2025 (In Progress)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/mendapo.v6i3.51057

Abstract

Corruption in the natural resources sector, particularly in the tin mining industry, constitutes a crime that not only causes significant losses to state finances but also reflects structural failures in state governance in fulfilling its constitutional mandate as stipulated under Article 33 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This article aims to critically examine the role of the government and the judiciary in the PT Timah Tbk corruption case through an analysis of the Corruption Court Decision Number 70/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024/PN.Jkt.Pst, employing the perspectives of substantive justice, progressive law, and administrative law. This study adopts a normative legal research method using statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. The findings reveal that although the court decision formally satisfies law enforcement requirements through criminal sanctions and the recovery of state financial losses, judicial reasoning remains predominantly legal-positivistic and focuses on individual criminal liability. The dimensions of the state’s structural responsibility, governance failures in the mining sector, and the systemic impacts of corruption on public interests have not been adequately articulated in the ratio decidendi of the decision. As a result, substantive justice is reduced to mere procedural justice. This article argues that the judiciary holds a strategic position as the guardian of public interest and an agent of social transformation in corruption cases classified as extraordinary crimes. Therefore, strengthening judicial reasoning is essential to ensure that court decisions function not only as instruments of punishment, but also as mechanisms for correcting public policy failures and promoting governance reform.
Co-Authors Afriyandi, Muhammad Rizcky Gabriella Bridget Tarandung, Helena Intan Amara Dewi, Adinda Nancy Glhoria Situmorang Permata Sari, Masayu Nilam Rahmadania, Andi Wulan Situmorang, Nancy Glhoria Tira Varany, Yacinta