Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Konstitusi: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Nabila Ikbal
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Perbandingan Metode Penyelesaian Sengketa Tradisional dan Digital : Sebuah Pendekatan terhadap Optimalisasi ADR Nabila Ikbal; Diana Setiawati
Konstitusi : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Konstitusi : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/konstitusi.v2i1.427

Abstract

Disputes usually occur due to differences in ideas, beliefs, values, needs, and goals, until finally people with different backgrounds cannot work together and cannot avoid disputes. Litigation is the most traditional dispute resolution which is a process in court using applicable law. Alternative Dispute Resolution is a concept of dispute resolution outside the court that prioritizes a win-win solution which is now integrated into the adjudication process as part of CDR or CADR. With a normative research method, which is sourced from secondary legal data, with primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials, using qualitative data analysis methods by interpreting and describing questions contained in documents and laws and regulations. The results of this study indicate that the traditional dispute resolution method is a slow, protracted, and relatively expensive dispute resolution process, while the digital dispute resolution method in an approach to optimizing ADR has advantages in economic factors, scope factors and good relationship building factors.
Co-Authors Diana Setiawati