Baram, Sadi Hassan
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Priority of Application Regarding the Inheritance Provisions Differed between the Iraqi Personal Status Law and the Amended Law in the Kurdistan Region Baram, Sadi Hassan
As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/as-siyasi.v3i2.18440

Abstract

This research examines the conflict arising from the differences in legal texts between the existing Iraqi Personal Status Law and the frequently amended laws in the Kurdistan Region. Furthermore, the issuance of amendments by the Kurdistan Region has exacerbated this conflict, leading to confusion and disputes between the two legal frameworks. The uncertainties surrounding the rationale behind these amendments have raised questions and doubts among legal practitioners and researchers, prompting a conservative approach within the courts. This study addresses and resolves these uncertainties by employing a comparative and analytical methodology. With a focus on constitutional and legal standards and the principle of justice, the research aims to clarify the applicability of either law. By undertaking this comprehensive analysis, the study endeavors to eliminate perceptions of ambiguity and hesitation, thereby contributing to a more cohesive legal landscape in the region. The research results show the fundamental difference between the Iraqi Personal Status Law and the amended law in the Kurdistan Region in matters of inheritance, specifically centered on the obligatory will and the wife's inheritance, and the Kurdish legislator made amendments in both issues, considering that amending federal laws is guaranteed to the regions by constitutional texts as long as they do not conflict with the constant provisions of Islam and the principles of democracy. This is not considered a departure from the 2005 Iraqi constitutional framework because the Federal Supreme Court, in its capacity as supervisor of the constitutionality of laws.
Legal and Constitutional Analysis of Federal Court Decision No. 230/Federal/2022: Regarding Marriage to Second Wife in the Province of Kurdistan Baram, Sadi Hassan
As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/as-siyasi.v4i2.23614

Abstract

The Federal Court of Iraq issued Decision No. 230/Federal/2022, declaring the unconstitutionality of Article 12 of Law No. 15 of 2008, which grants the first wife the right to request a divorce if the husband marries a second wife. This article, enacted in the Kurdistan Region, was deemed to violate Islamic law and Article 2(a) of the 2005 Iraqi Constitution, which prohibits laws conflicting with the principles of Islam. The decision left behind a heated debate in the courts of the region between working with the article that the court cancelled or adhering to the court’s decision as the competent authority to interpret legal texts and resolve controversial issues. This study aims to examine the legal basis supporting the Federal Court’s decision with legal articles in force in the current Iraqi Personal Status Law, highlight the conflicts in the Kurdistan Region’s legal amendments, and address the decision’s strengths and shortcomings. Utilizing an analytical method, the study reviews and interprets relevant legal texts within the context of Iraqi Personal Status Law. the court, regardless of its supervisory authority, in addition to the justifications mentioned for the cancellation of Article 18 in the Kurdistan Region, is not infallible from shortcomings and observations; because it opposed in its decision what some sects have gone to, and deprived the wife of the right to demand separation under the pretext of violating the texts of the constitution and Islamic law. The study proved that the condition is not contrary to Islamic law as decided by the court; because it is a subject of disagreement among scholars, and it is also not considered contrary to the constants of Islamic rulings as stated in the decision of the Federal Court, because there is no jurisprudential consensus on such constants.