p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Studi Keislaman
Hadi, Andi Ibnu
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

AKIBAT HUKUM ANAK HASIL BAYI TABUNG DAN INSEMINASI DI INDONESIA DAN FILIPINA Hadi, Andi Ibnu
An-Nahdliyyah: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol 3 No 2 (2024): An-Nahdliyyah : Jurnal Studi Keislaman
Publisher : Institut Nahdlatul Ulama Tasikmalaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70502/ajsk.v3i2.53

Abstract

There are similarities and differences in legal regulations on IVF and insemination between Indonesia and the Philippines and have an impact on the status and legal standing of children. This article aims to determine the comparative legal consequences of IVF children in Indonesia and the Philippines. This study uses a comparative and normative juridical approach. From the results of the study, there are differences and similarities in the legal consequences for IVF children and insemination in Indonesia and the Philippines both from the aspect of civil law and from the aspect of criminal law.
PROBLEMATIKA DISPENSASI NIKAH DALAM PERSPEKTIF KEPENTINGAN TERBAIK ANAK: Analisis Terhadap Penerapan PERMA No. 5 Tahun 2019 Hadi, Andi Ibnu
An-Nahdliyyah: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol 4 No 2 (2025): AN-NAHDLIYYAH: Jurnal Studi Keislaman
Publisher : Institut Nahdlatul Ulama Tasikmalaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70502/ajsk.v4i2.206

Abstract

This study aims to examine the issues surrounding the granting of marriage dispensations in Indonesia, with a focus on the implementation of Articles 14 and 16 of Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 5 of 2019 on Guidelines for Adjudicating Applications for Marriage Dispensation. This regulation emphasizes that judges must take into account the best interests of the child before granting permission for underage marriage. The study employs a normative juridical method with a conceptual and case study approach, analyzing several rulings from religious courts. The findings reveal that, although PERMA No. 5 of 2019 provides a solid framework for child protection, in practice, court decisions still tend to be based on urgent considerations such as pregnancy and the physical and spiritual readiness of the prospective bride and groom. Recommendations from psychologists, medical professionals, and child protection agencies (KPAID) are often not treated as primary considerations.