p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Synergisia
Diandra Putri Sophianandita
Fakultas Bisnis dan Humaniora, Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Role of the International Labour Organization (ILO) in the Protection of the Human Rights of Indonesian Migrant Workers Anisa Sartika Madaniyah; Diandra Putri Sophianandita; Pradindha Tasya Irawan; Yumi Lestari Silalahi
Synergisia Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Synergisia-MEI
Publisher : Pt. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/23p22d10

Abstract

As we know, Indonesians themselves have a fairly high level of competitiveness in terms of employment, which makes it quite difficult to get a job in the country. The minimality of employment makes many Indonesians choose to complain about their fate in another country, often referred to as migrant workers. Indonesia is one of the countries that has a considerable number of migrant workers and is scattered around the world. However, many of the Indonesian migrant workers have experienced human rights violations from their employers, such as discrimination, sexual harassment, physical and mental violence, wage withholding, and even unpaid wages. Human rights are inherent rights of every individual as long as they exist, including the right to education, freedom of religion, access to health facilities, the right to work, and other rights. To address the violations of migrant workers' rights, Indonesia joined the International Labour Organization (ILO), which is under the umbrella of the United Nations, as a reservoir that serves to provide protection for migrants. The ILO also protects workers' rights by improving living standards, hiring policies, working hours, working contracts, health care for workers, and dealing with all workers who have or are experiencing employment problems.
Indonesia's Response to Australia's Wiretapping of Several Important People in Indonesia in 2013 Muhammad Zakariya Khandalawi; M. Iqbal Maulana; Anisa Sartika Madaniyah; Bagas Wikan T; Diandra Putri Sophianandita
Synergisia Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Synergisia-MEI
Publisher : Pt. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/y4ypff75

Abstract

The bilateral relationship between Indonesia and Australia has often experienced ups and downs, including a number of conflicts that have strained relations between the two countries, especially during the administration of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono. During the era of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, incidents of espionage received significant media attention when Edward Snowden revealed the identities of several Indonesian officials who were the targets of SIGINT wiretapping operations in Asia, especially in Australia. President SBY (Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono) at that time lost his composure after learning that his cellphone was tapped by the Australian Intelligence Agency. The news of the case conducted by the Australian state against several officials in Indonesia raises the question of how Indonesia is responding to the case. There are concerns about Indonesia's basis for handling these cases, given that news of Australia's prosecution of prominent Indonesian figures was reported in 2013 by Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, the President of the Republic of Indonesia. Indonesia took several steps in response to the wiretapping. Firstly, Indonesia requested official clarification and clarity from Australia, and secondly, the Indonesian government protested by suspending and rethinking a number of bilateral agreements with Australia for a while until there was a clear response and confidence that there would be no wiretapping of state interests. Although Indonesia showed disappointment regarding the wiretapping action carried out by Australia and Indonesia as the party that decided a number of collaborations, Indonesia first contacted Australia after the disclosure of this case