Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Noesantara Islamic Studies International Journal of Language and Ubiquitous Learning
Daud Rasyid
Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah
Religion Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Islamization of Knowledge During the Caliphate of Harun Al-Rashid: A Historical Analysis Evalinda Evalinda; Daud Rasyid; Abdullah Ghulam Nazih; Intan Wulansari; Hayatuddin Hayatuddin
Journal of Noesantara Islamic Studies Vol. 2 No. 6 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/jnis.v2i6.2878

Abstract

This study examines the process of the Islamization of knowledge during the reign of Caliph Harun al-Rashid as a significant phase in the development of Islamic civilization. During this period, the Islamic world absorbed foreign knowledge from Greek, Persian, Indian, and Roman traditions, which was subsequently translated, critically evaluated, and integrated into the Islamic epistemological framework. Employing a qualitative method with a literature-based approach, this research analyzes classical historical sources and contemporary scholarly journals using historical-descriptive analysis. The findings indicate that Bayt al-Hikmah functioned as a major center for translation and scientific development, fostering cross-cultural and interreligious scholarly collaboration and contributing to advances in mathematics, medicine, astronomy, and chemistry. The integration of external knowledge also influenced the development of logic, kalam, and usul al-fiqh, leading to a more rational intellectual tradition. Despite criticism from traditionalist groups, particularly concerning the influence of Greek philosophy, this process strengthened Islamic epistemological boundaries and ensured that scientific development remained aligned with the principle of tawhid.
A Critique of the Thought of Modern American Orientalist Daniel Pipe Nabiel Almusawa; Daud Rasyid; Zamaksyarif Abdul Majid; Muhibuddin Muhibuddin; Siti Nuri Nurhaidah; Siti Atieqoh
International Journal of Language and Ubiquitous Learning Vol. 3 No. 6 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/ijlul.v3i6.2871

Abstract

Background. This study critically examines the thoughts and perspectives of Daniel Pipes, a prominent modern American Orientalist known for his controversial views on Islam and the Muslim world. Purpose. The research analyzes the ideological underpinnings, methodological approaches, and political motivations that shape Pipes' discourse, particularly in post-9/11 Western perceptions of Islam. Method. Employing a critical discourse analysis framework and drawing upon postcolonial theory especially the insights of Edward Said this study identifies recurring patterns of essentialism, securitization, and cultural superiority in Pipes' writings. Results. The research argues that while Pipes positions himself as a scholar of political Islam, his works often blur the lines between academic inquiry and ideological advocacy. Conclusion. This critique contributes to broader discussions on Orientalism in contemporary settings and raises questions about the role of scholarship in perpetuating or challenging Islamophobic narratives in Western media and policy.
Co-Authors Abdullah Ghulam Nazih Evalinda Evalinda Hayatuddin Hayatuddin Intan Wulansari Muhibuddin Muhibuddin Nabiel Almusawa Siti Atieqoh Siti Nuri Nurhaidah Zamaksyarif Abdul Majid