Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Madani: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal
Samsudin, La Ode
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Education Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Madani: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal

 1 
Metodologi Fiqh Al-Hadis: Metode, Teknik Interpretasi dan Pendekatan Dalam Memahami Hadis Yasir, Muhammad; Ashshiddiq, Nasiruddin; Samsudin, La Ode; Maidinn, Muhammad Sabir
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 3, No 1 (2025): February
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14752728

Abstract

regions and when the Prophet Muhammad died. Therefore, scholars tried hard to bridge these problems so that the science of fiqh al-hadith emerged. In addition to the problems above, another problem is because today's society really needs an explanation of the science of how to understand hadith or fiqh al-hadith, so that they do not get lost in a deviant understanding. The results of this study indicate that the methodology of understanding hadith is the science of procedures or methods that are scientific in nature to explore and understand religious teachings in the form of the will or messages of the Prophet Muhammad. precisely, which are contained in the hadiths narrated by him. This methodology of understanding hadith contains many tools, such as methods, interpretation techniques, and various approaches. In addition, the method of understanding hadith can be classified into four models. First, is the Tahlili method (analysis), namely explaining the hadiths of the Prophet Muhammad. by explaining all aspects contained in the hadith and explaining the meanings contained therein. Second, is the ijmali method, which is explaining or explaining the hadiths according to the order of the hadith books in a concise manner, but can represent the literal meaning of the hadith in a language that is easy to understand. Third, is the maudu'i method, which is a method of understanding the hadith by collecting the hadith in a particular theme. And the fourth, is the muqa>ran method, which is a method of understanding the hadith by: comparing hadiths that have the same or similar wording in the same case or have different wording in the same case.
Al-Farabi dan Ibnu Sina (Pemikiran Tentang Emanasi) Samsudin, La Ode; Santalia, Indo
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 2, No 12 (2025): Januari
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14556776

Abstract

Ibn Sina and al-Farabi argue that the process of the formation of this universe radiates everything from God through ten minds (al-‘Aql al-‘Asharah). God thinks about Himself; thought is a power, and the thought of God, the Almighty, is great and awesome, creating the first mind. The first mind also thinks about God and itself, so this power produces the second mind and the first sky. The second mind also thinks about God and itself and produces the third mind and the stars. And so on, the minds think about God and themselves and then produce the next minds and the planets. The third mind produces the fourth mind and Saturn. The fourth mind produces the fifth mind and Jupiter. The fifth mind produces the sixth mind and Mars. The sixth mind produces the seventh mind and the Sun. The seventh mind produces the eighth mind and Venus. The eighth mind produces the ninth mind and Mercury. According to Al-Farabi and Ibn Sina, both adapted the theory of emanation to explain the relationship between God and the creation of the universe. Al-Farabi saw nature as the result of emanation from God, who is the first being, while Ibn Sina emphasized that nature was created from a state of nothingness and not as part of God's substance. Although both agreed that nature is new and created, they faced criticism from Al-Ghazali who considered the theory of emanation could reduce God's position as Creator and potentially lead to pantheism. This criticism shows the tension between philosophical thought and theological teachings in the Islamic tradition.
Co-Authors Ashshiddiq, Nasiruddin Indo Santalia Maidinn, Muhammad Sabir Muhammad Yasir